Re: [CinCVS] Pentium D 2.6 GHz or AMD Semprom 3.0 GHz

2006-05-18 Thread Brendan Conoboy
Pierre Marc Dumuid wrote: Anyone have a suggestion either way? I initially thought AMD Sempron cause as I was personally curious to see how a 64 bit machine performs, but now I am actually thinking that the dual processor may be more useful? The dual core is a quite beneficial when doing any

Re: [CinCVS] Pentium D 2.6 GHz or AMD Semprom 3.0 GHz

2006-05-18 Thread Andraz Tori
On čet, 2006-05-18 at 12:05 +0300, Dimitrios wrote: > On Thu, 18 May 2006 15:31:26 +0930 Pierre Marc Dumuid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Just curious as to what people think about the performance of > > cinelerra. Which would be faster? A dual core or a AMD Semprom 3.0 Ghz > > (64 bit)

Re: [CinCVS] Pentium D 2.6 GHz or AMD Semprom 3.0 GHz

2006-05-18 Thread Dimitrios
On Thu, 18 May 2006 15:31:26 +0930 Pierre Marc Dumuid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just curious as to what people think about the performance of > cinelerra. Which would be faster? A dual core or a AMD Semprom 3.0 Ghz > (64 bit) I would also like some answers. I haven't started using cinelerr

[CinCVS] Pentium D 2.6 GHz or AMD Semprom 3.0 GHz

2006-05-17 Thread Pierre Marc Dumuid
Sorry for asking here, but I am really a bit confused. I am wanting to buy a computer primarily for cinelerra, with a limited budget. I am wondering if Dual core is more importaint than 64 bit. Just curious as to what people think about the performance of cinelerra. Which would be faster?