On 2007-06-03 19:27, Johannes Sixt wrote:
On Sunday 03 June 2007 20:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, here is a patch implementing my improvements to wipe. If this isn't
the best way to submit patches, let me know what would be.
I'm mimicked the existing code's semantics in that a wipe
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Kevin Brosius wrote:
Cool idea. Is there a problem with shape wipe that prevented you from
using a new shape wipe mask for vertical wipes?
The main issue with shape wipe is simply that it's less convenient - I was
in fact using it before I made these changes, but that meant
I decided to enhance the wipe plugin to do vertical as well as horizonal
wipes, and I've a few questions and issues about this code:
- I really don't like the indenting style of the existing code. Do I have
to follow it, or can I switch to something more readable for the parts I
write?
- We
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I decided to enhance the wipe plugin to do vertical as well as horizonal
wipes, and I've a few questions and issues about this code:
- I really don't like the indenting style of the existing code. Do I have
to follow it, or can I switch to something more readable
Okay, here is a patch implementing my improvements to wipe. If this isn't
the best way to submit patches, let me know what would be.
I'm mimicked the existing code's semantics in that a wipe with a direction
of up means a wipe from the top of the screen down to the bottom. That
seems
On Sunday 03 June 2007 20:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, here is a patch implementing my improvements to wipe. If this isn't
the best way to submit patches, let me know what would be.
I'm mimicked the existing code's semantics in that a wipe with a direction
of up means a wipe from the
