Hi,
Well after some reading and brainstorming I think I will amalgamate
several of the ideas mentioned here, so I sincerely thank all who gave
their suggestions/warnings/opinions. The AV Linux ISO Image is a unique
non-commercial presentation media so I will stop calling it non-GPL since
that evok
Well like everyone else who has chimed in on this I am not a lawyer either.
Since you are basically doing a Debian remaster look at the model they use
for free and non free repositories. I think what's throwing smoke in
everyone's eyes is your wording, a "non gpl linux distribution" That sets
off m
2), into GPL v3.
Can anybody confirm this?
Nicola
> Subject: Re: [CinCV] AV Linux and it's 'non-GPL' license
> From: i...@bandshed.net
> To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no
> Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 14:29:33 -0700
>
> Eeesh!
>
> Joining this list has been
Well then I'm in good company! Thanks for sharing that raffa!
-GLEN
> On 10/06/2011 11:29 PM, i...@bandshed.net wrote:
>>...is everyone greeted with such 'hospitality'?...lol
>
> No, only special fellows in the same shoes as Cinelerra. :-)
> Guess why Cinelerra is not included in Debian and Ubun
dy.
>
> I'd just like to add that I have doubts you can re-license the GPL
> components (which are essentially Debian, so GPL v2), into GPL v3.
>
> Can anybody confirm this?
>
> Nicola
>
>
>
>> Subject: Re: [CinCV] AV Linux and it's 'non-GPL' lic
On 10/06/2011 11:29 PM, i...@bandshed.net wrote:
...is everyone greeted with such 'hospitality'?...lol
No, only special fellows in the same shoes as Cinelerra. :-)
Guess why Cinelerra is not included in Debian and Ubuntu? :-)
Ciao!
Raffaella
PS: a hint to the answer:
http://cinelerra.org/docs
m this?
Nicola
> Subject: Re: [CinCV] AV Linux and it's 'non-GPL' license
> From: i...@bandshed.net
> To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no
> Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 14:29:33 -0700
>
> Eeesh!
>
> Joining this list has been both uncomfortable and educational at the same
>
Eeesh!
Joining this list has been both uncomfortable and educational at the same
time...is everyone greeted with such 'hospitality'?...lol
OK, so what about this:
AV Linux goes GPL(3) and I issue a disclaimer statement declaring which
EXACT packages are 'non-free' but come bundled with the ISO a
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 15:41:21 -0700, wrote:
but I was under the impression that any derived work could be licensed
outside of the GPL provided the source code of the derived work was made
available upon request.
You may be confused with the "binary redistribution" clause of the GPLv2,
which
Glen,
Thanks again. Really, I didn't mean to bash, really just trying to understand.
In fact your answer to Octavio sort of clarified the issue even further.
Cheers,
Nicola
> Subject: RE: [CinCV] AV Linux and it's 'non-GPL' license
> From: i...@bandshed.net
>
Hi Again,
Well I'm not a lawyer either so we have something in common!
I've been distributing AV Linux like this since 2007 and to be honest
never have had this come up, I will have to scour the fine print a little
closer but I was under the impression that any derived work could be
licensed outs
Hi Octavio,
No the tweaks are not to the source otherwise I'd be sure to share them
here, unfortunately my cranium is a little too small to tackle the source
code.
The tweaks are basically in the packaging and on the LiveDVD. I have
Cinelerra launch with a script and automatically finds and load
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 10:41:12 -0700, wrote:
I take a personal interest in it and have recently done a
lot of behind the scenes configuration work to make easier for new users
in the next AV Linux release.
Hi!
Did the above require changes to the source code?
--
Octavio.
___
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 10:41:12 -0700, wrote:
I take a personal interest in it and have recently done a
lot of behind the scenes configuration work to make easier for new users
in the next AV Linux release.
Hi!
Have these tweaks needed any kind of source code modification?
--
Octavio.
__
Glen,
Thanks for the clarifications. Although I am not a lawyer, I have doubts about
the fact that the license in AV linux can be changed at the developer's
convenience, since it still is derived work. The GPL specifically says that
derived work qualifies for the GPL license itself. LGPL is mo
15 matches
Mail list logo
