Briefly, take a single 1.0 test including CCNA,
you'll be CCNP 1.0. In order to be CCNP 2.0 all tests need to be
2.0. Although the 1.0 tests go obsolete on 7/31, Cisco will for sure
allow some perios of time after 7/31 (like a year) to retake any 1.0 tests
with the equivelent 2.0 test to c
>>Hello all. I'm in a bind regarding Cisco's tests in the CCNP track.
I just finished preparing for the ACRC test, my first for CCNP, and it
looks >>like it will be obsolete in a couple of months! Will I have to
take the Routing 2.0 test again to get CCNP 2.0 certified? Or will the
olde
Please do not post ANY message to this group that is not related to the
discussion of Computer Networking! Even if it is a reply to a message that
was offensive or whatever. It is still not an excuse to send a message that
is off topic. If you find something offensive, please forward it to
[EMA
Hello all. I'm in a bind regarding
Cisco's tests in the CCNP track. I just finished preparing for the ACRC
test, my first for CCNP, and it looks like it will be obsolete in a couple of
months! Will I have to take the Routing 2.0 test again to get CCNP 2.0
certified? Or will the older
Congratulations!! and thank you for sharing the wealth (knowledge).
How long was your total study time? Six months? A year?
Nat
CCNA, MCSE, CNA
___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info
Hey Group,
It's kinda rare that I write to the group. I'm one of the silent ones who
just takes interest in reading the Q & A's that are presented. I get a little
smarter everyday due to it. I've noticed the recent battle over the infadel
who is posting nonsence material. Everyone is mad an
All this foul languages and abuse is because of the free e-mail. Everyone
can get a free mail from isp, with different name .. Some bad guys abuses
it..Internet is originated from people who know how to control the traffic
but now end up with bad guys abuse it.. Sad, sad sad..
Thks/Brgds
ip route-cac same-interface
--- Francisco Muniz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, elaborating on it... It IS process switched (s
> ip inter et0/0 says
> "Fast switching on the same interface is disabled")
> so now the question is:
> can I enable fast switching on the same interface?
>
> Franc
I have a channelized E1 connect to 7507, and timeslot 1 connect to 2611.
When i shutdown the e1 timeslot 1, does the 2611 ddn port cd signal would go
down?
If it is a leased line(no e1) between them, what happen? Thanks
___
FAQ, list archives, and subscription inf
Well, elaborating on it... It IS process switched (s ip inter et0/0 says
"Fast switching on the same interface is disabled") so now the question is:
can I enable fast switching on the same interface?
Francisco Muniz
"Francisco Muniz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió en el mensaje de noticias
8f7pfh$
It is automatically added in NT. Do a route print and u will see the route
table on ur NT machine.
Ryan
andre wrote:
> Does anyone know how to setup a /32 bit subnet mask(ex:255.255.255.255)
> on NT? I'm using anycast and need help. I can do this on Unix, but I'm
>
> running into a wall on NT
Does anyone know how to setup a /32 bit subnet mask(ex:255.255.255.255)
on NT? I'm using anycast and need help. I can do this on Unix, but I'm
running into a wall on NT. The conventional way through control panel
doesn't work, it gives me an error. Does anyone know of any software to
make th
I'm trying to find out the performance implications of using secundary IP
addresses on an ethernet interface (configuring "layer 3 VLANS"). From the
looks of it, it seems packets are process switched... Anyone know about
this? Any help would be appreciated.
Francisco Muniz
_
Does anyone know how to setup a /32 bit subnet mask(ex:255.255.255.255)
on NT? I'm using anycast and need help. I can do this on Unix, but I'm
running into a wall on NT. The conventional way through control panel
doesn't work, it gives me an error. Does anyone know of any software to
make this
What is a BOHF?
"Best Officer of the Headquartered Force"?
"Patrick Salmon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió en el mensaje de noticias
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Er folks,
>
> The address you're looking for is mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED].
>
> heck knows how many laws he's broken to date .
>
>
> Patrick Sal
Well, Cisco does have HP Hub in the product line. Page 133 January 2000,
Products Quick Reference Guide.
Go figure. Wonder if HP users have to check Cisco for specs. .
"Joe Pinkus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Why don't you check the HP web site instead of
Big deal Sherlock. You have mastered the mysteries
of IP addressing.
When are you guys gonna tire of mentioning my name?
Everybody complains about off topic posting yet you
guys can beat a joke to death.
Gee Wiz people, even I'm bored with all the extraenous
garbage.
Don't do it because I
Hi Guys,
Thanks for all the suggestions however I have now additionally noted the
error below when attempting to utilize the wr net command for tftp.
BrPix1(config)# wr net
Building configuration...
TFTP write 'c:\tftp' at (Inside IP Address) on interface 1
Unspecified Error
__
Well, as an offering along that line, here's a command summary for BGP (as
always, mind the wrap):
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/np1_r
/1rprt1/1rbgp.htm
It's also available as a .pdf file
Annlee
"Tim Ross" wrote in message
<043301bfb92b$2012d2a0$[EMAIL
This looks like it is from Whirled-Routers. If so I can vouch for the
guy. I know him from the Cisco User group in Southern California.
He always tells everyone what to look for in buying equipment while
never touting himself as the best place to go.
"Jim K CCNA, CCNP, MCSE" wrote:
>
> Student
you are talking bridging at layer 2 and routing at layer 3. If you want to
bridge ip (layer 3 protocol), then you must turn off ip routing on the
router that will be acting as the bridge. The other requirements are that
your hosts must be in the same bridge-group and subnet. If you don't turn
bri
21 matches
Mail list logo
