methods for summarizing routes in FATKID ospf401

2001-04-08 Thread Clue Less
ize routes, which works for any router, running any routing protocol? How about a fourth?" http://www.fatkid.com/html/401_advanced_opsf_-_hints.html Does anyone know the 3rd or other ways and could kindly let me know? Clue Less. _ FAQ, list archives, and subscrip

Re: DLSW filtering

2001-04-04 Thread Clue Less
d like >to filter by ACL 700-799.. ie.. > >R1: > >dlsw local-peer peer-id 1.1.1.1 <--- local token ring interface >dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 2.2.2.2 dmac-output-list 701 <--- Peer statement >for R2's token ring interface. > >access 701 permit 3000.3000.0000

DLSW filtering

2001-04-03 Thread Clue Less
should still be able to talk to hosts on e0 of R2. |---e0 R1 tok0---Ring 1 | | IP cloud | | |---e0 R2 tok0---Ring 2 Clue Less. _ FAQ, list

Re: EXTENDED ACL for distribute-list

2000-10-05 Thread Clue Less
Hi Hans, and all, Firstly, let me just clarify that this question is just a learning exercise. I know the standard access-list would work, but I want to find out how to limit the mask as well. It could be my fault if I didn't make this clear initially. Now back to the meat: I've tried your ac

Re: bridge vlan

2000-10-03 Thread Clue Less
I'm not much of a switching person, but here's my $0.02: Adding a separate bridge device connecting the 2 vlan can do the job. But why not just connect a cross over cable between the 2 vlan. Not sure the pros and cons on this. If you want 1 big broadcast domain (which is what you're doing), you

Re: Multiple default gateways, same result?

2000-10-03 Thread Clue Less
Just on a Like Hubert was saying, the route for ethernet is redundant. But just on the side note, if you're pointing to another network of the e0 eg. ip route 123.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 e0, you want to make sure the next hop router on e0 will answer proxy arp. Because that's what the router arps for

EXTENDED ACL for distribute-list

2000-09-30 Thread Clue Less
Hi all, Could someone shed some light on how to use EXTENDED ACL for distribute-list? I'm trying to allow only 10.1.1.0/24 route to be distributed by eigrp 90. Below is config and debug ip eigrp output. I thought ACL 110 is a bit "relaxed" but should have allow the 10.1.1.0/24 route to be dist

Re: Messages log

2000-09-30 Thread Clue Less
It's on the UniCD Dwell down depending on which version of IOS: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/index.htm Clue On 29 Sep 2000 18:22:36 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ElephantChild) wrote: >On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Elvis Domínguez wrote: > >> I need a book to know the mean

Re: Bridging Question

2000-09-30 Thread Clue Less
Check out: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ibm_c/bcprt2/bcddlsw.htm#xtocid2213520 Clue On 30 Sep 2000 17:01:40 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Ejay Hire") wrote: >Pardon me while I blatantly expose my Ignorance. > >From the SRB/DLSW chapter in the book "Cisco

Re: Migrating from EIGRP to OSPF - Bad News!

2000-09-28 Thread Clue Less
Oops, "ip ospf point-to-point" is the command I was thinking about, as Lauren mentioned. Not point-to-multipoint. versions needed as per http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/104/9.html#QB On 27 Sep 2000 08:10:59 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clue Less) wrote: >All the "O"

Re: Up/up but no connection

2000-09-28 Thread Clue Less
Those 22 bytes would probably be the keepalive for HDLC if that's what you're running. Interface would only go up/up if layer 1 & 2 is good, in the case of HDLC it will need to see keepalive from the other end. "debug serial interface" on both end would be a good one to check this. Personally, I

Re: I screwed up?

2000-09-27 Thread Clue Less
In case you're still working on it, you might want to firstly make sure the IOS is indeed deleted. You can check this at rommon> by dir flash: If the IOS is not there the URL below should help: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_mod/cis2600/cnfgnote/2600mem.htm#xtocid6827

Re: Migrating from EIGRP to OSPF - Bad News!

2000-09-27 Thread Clue Less
All the "O" routes are more specifc than the "D" routes, so they are suppose to be in the routing table. I'm assuming they're ip addresses on loopback interfaces with /24 mask. You may want to try putting "ip ospf network point-to-multipoint" (if the version of IOS support this) and see if it ma

Re: ISDN - I can't ping bri0

2000-09-27 Thread Clue Less
Not sure, could you do a 'debug isdn q931' and 'debug ppp neg' to find out how far it gets? Clue. On 26 Sep 2000 21:58:41 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Ron S") wrote: >Can you please help here ? >From routerA I try to ping RouterB and ping is unsuccessfull ? > >#show dialer displays "Last status:F

Re: what is unmumbered?

2000-09-22 Thread Clue Less
If you're asking about "ip unnumbered", here's some info on it: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/701/20.html Clue On 22 Sep 2000 02:16:21 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("rsma") wrote: > >**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/Associates

Re: isdn backup

2000-09-21 Thread Clue Less
e an access list on the dialer to prevent dialing >for RIP updates, etc. depending on what type of traffic you have traversing >the router. > > >-Erik > >- Original Message - >From: "Clue Less" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >S

isdn backup

2000-09-21 Thread Clue Less
Greetings all, Got a question on routing with ISDN backup. Could someone shed some light on how to properly implement the backup command with routing? I'm using the backup command, and ip unnumber for both primary and backup interfaces. int loop 0 R3 int s0/0-primary--int s2 R5 int