Derek... speaking of typo's my email was SUPPOSED to say:
172.21.134.0/21 = 172.21.128.1 to 172.21.135.254
while
172.21.136.0/21 = 172.21.136.1 to 172.21.143.254
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19977&t=19970
Dyland,
you're right, it is a typo or something. As a sanity check (probably a BAD
habit) I use the subnet program offered by boson... according to that program:
172.21.134.0/21 = 172.21.128.1 to 172.21.235.254
while
172.21.136.0/21 = 172.21.128.1 to 172.21.136.1 to 172.21.143.254
so, I w
Hi Patrick,
I may need you to elaborate on your question a bit, because I am a little
unclear on your desired OSPF outcome here, but
Besides the obvious passive interface -- which does allow the interface
address to be advertised via OSPF, but will not allow the router to form an
adjacen
Mamoor,
do you have in-band access to the routers? If so, ensure that you have
exec enabled on the console ports... this sounds like (since it is affecting
3 routers, but not all routers) to be a configuation issue, rather than a
cable issue.
good luck,
Dave
Message Posted at:
http://www.gro
Mike,
try making your addresses .1, ie 10.1.50.1 255.255.255.0
should be the trick...
Dave
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19440&t=19428
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/
Actually, she's right (guilty)...
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=19441&t=19428
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violati
The other thing worth considering here is that perhaps they want the
bragging rights... face it, some company's (especially network consulting)
hire CCIE's for their knowledge, as well as so they can say "We have X
number of CCIE's". Your initials don't just sound good after your name, but
also yo
Manny,
I totally agree with John. So much theory that you see in the CCIE written
is covered in the CCNP tests. Plus, it takes a while to get the CCIE number
behind your name, while you could have CCNP after your name after passing
just one more written test. I personally recommend knocking out
Thomas,
This question has a lot of strange inaccuracies in it, but here we go...
1. The routing path chosen will always use the "longest match rule", in
other words between 10.50.0.0/16 and 10.32.0.0/12 the route chosen will be
the 10.50.0.0/16.
2. Your mask is bad for the static route... if yo
Hello sami,
probably the best way to do what you're asking would be to set the type 5
type (E1 or E2) when and where you do the actual redistribution... ie:
redistribute igrp 1 metric-type 1
but that wasn't really your question... I don't think that you would want
to try to change the defa
rajesh,
I just experienced the same problem in a lab this week. If you establish
OSPF neighbors ok w/out authentication, and your debug shows that you are
failing on mismatch authentication, try redoing your command by removing it
and reentering it... I don't know why this worked for me, and I
11 matches
Mail list logo
