yup
-Original Message-
From: Puckette, Larry (TIFPC) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 25 July 2003 1:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NOBODY emails [7:72997]
Is anybody else receiving multiple emails from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that are empty??
Larry Puckette
Network Analyst
Though to answer your question :)
Summarization means advertising the biggest network you choose/should
advertise. If you had a /23 that was routed as 2 /24s in your network,
you'd summarize those as a /23 on the way out of your network to keep the
routing table smaller...
You should probably
In the event that you are running an internal dynamic routing protocol that
would normally be the reason why the /24 is in your routing table (hence the
ability for it to be in the BGP advertisements), should the place you are
dynamically routing it to go away, so does your route in the IGP, thus
try doing a squeeze on the flash to get rid of the deleted file..
-Original Message-
From: Sales [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 17 March 2003 12:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Unable to delete flash [7:65529]
Some possible things to try would be to use the /force
Why can't the L3 switches be run as L2 switches (ignoring the routing
capabilities) in that situation? If those two switches were connected in
that case, then connected to the core, wouldn't that solve the problem of a
gateway being 3 or 4 L3 switches away?
-Original Message-
From:
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Understanding VLANs - how they remove the phys [7:63196]
Emilia Lambros wrote:
Why can't the L3 switches be run as L2 switches (ignoring the
routing capabilities) in that situation? If those two switches
were connected in that case, then connected to the core,
wouldn't
Why don't you try removing the line you want it to be below (as well as the
deny ip any any at the end) then put in the new line, the next line(s) and
the deny line?
ie
no access-list from-internet permit ip any host 10.10.10.4
no access-list from-internet permit ip any host 10.10.10.5
no
to put one in lets say 8th spot.
Emilia Lambros wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Why don't you try removing the line you want it to be below (as well as
the
deny ip any any at the end) then put in the new line, the next line(s) and
the deny line?
ie
no acc
servers.
Clayton
Emilia Lambros wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I'm looking more for a way to play with how the nat pool I have behaves
with
IP address use. The NAT config and translations are all working, however
I
can't find a situation online that shows
It all makes sense now :)
As much of a kludge as it is, the individual NAT pools will be perfect.
There's several offices, which means several IP addresses will be used if I
make individual pools.
-Original Message-
From: Doug S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 10 January 2003
/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_tech_note0
9186a0080093fca.shtml
watch the wrap.
HTH
--
TANSTAAFL
there ain't no such thing as a free lunch
Emilia Lambros wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi all,
I have an application being load balanced at one site
Hi all,
I have an application being load balanced at one site (sticky sessions set
such that each connection from 1 IP will continue its transactions to the
same server it started on) and at another site, the users accessing the load
balanced application.
The users come in from different office
As far as "may not be globally routable" is concerned, keep in mind that a
lot of the big boys use access-lists to filter smaller networks out.
There was an old standard access-list *Access-list 112* I think it was, that
used to block all bar /19s. So, if you were advertising anything smaller
Haven't distribute-lists for BGP been made obsolete by prefix-lists?
Regards,
Em
- Original Message -
From: suaveguru [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 5:26 PM
Subject: distribute list problem
Hi,
I have already configured BGP for but our
he's got no synchronization, so it doesn't *need* to be in the internal
routing protocol does it?
Em
- Original Message -
From: McCallum, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'suaveguru' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2000 8:07 PM
Subject: RE: distribute list
Are
there any that do just the IP management?
Most
that I've seen do all sorts of DNS and DHCP stuff as well as manage IPs. I
need something that will JUST help me manage a multitude of IP addresses - not
provide DNS entries or make them available as a DHCP server :) Is there
anything
Policy depends on the situation you're in .. The most common meanings of
"policy" I've seen in a BGP environment are :
a) policy as in policy routing - route-maps and the like
b) policy as in international and domestic traffic being divided .. as in
you can ask for just international
I think from memory, IRC servers also uses ports between and 7000 ..
Its been a while since I used IRC, but I'm pretty sure it still operates on
those ports.
Em
- Original Message -
From: SH Wesson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 1:24 AM
There are some ISPs that will not route your network blocks unless they're
registered in the RADB and advertised the exact way they're registered. I
know of places in the USA who will not accept routing updates unless its in
the RADB first. There's also places in Australia who will ensure that
Isn't that administrative distance?
-Original Message-
From: JEK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2000 4:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: EIGRP IGRP
That's 100 for IGRP not EIGRP.
Eigrp is 90/170 where the 170 is an external learned route.
JEK
For testing connectivity between two ports, try telnetting to the port ..
For example if you have "Server1" - 192.168.0.1 and you need to see if
"Router A" can access "Server1" on a particular port (say port 110, on
Router A:
Router A# telnet 192.168.0.1 110
You can also specify a source
A while back, someone posted a link to the online Cisco practice exams ..
something like
www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/front.x/wwtraining etc etc
I don't have access to my archives at the moment but I was wondering if
someone would be so kind as to forward me that link again.
Thanks,
Em
in my experience with having two default routes on a router, they've
load-shared across those two interfaces/links.
For example, we had a router with a fibre connection and also a wireless
connection. The router had two default routes - one across fibre, one
across wireless. The fibre went
That site doesn't exist btw .. "Document Not Found"
-Original Message-
From: Nick Brooks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2000 10:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cisco homepage help!!
you can sign up under the consultant program and get a CCO login that
way.
In response to the other part of the question, I know Cricket
(http://cricket.sourceforge.net/) does CPU/Memory monitoring and I MRTG does
load, but I'm not sure about memory .. you'd probably have to check it/play
with it for a while, but I have seen some pretty weird stuff done with MRTG
so you
You mean like "show proc cpu" and "show mem" and "show proc mem"??
Em
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 10:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Calculating bandwidth utilization
Hey,
Where can I find information
You mean like "show proc cpu" and "show mem" and "show proc mem"??
Em
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 10:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Calculating bandwidth utilization
Hey,
Where can I find information
27 matches
Mail list logo
