mmendation states is that if you are running other
> routing
> protocols like ospf who
> takes its decisions based on bandwidth statements then you
> shouldn't
> change them, because it
> will also affect ospf.
>
> But here think about this you could change the K values for
Hans PHAM wrote:
Sorry for the bad figure, this is a better one
..
.R2...
/..\..
.../\.
.R1..R4-R5
...\/.
\../..
.R3...
..
Link
1-2
Hans PHAM wrote:
Sorry for the bad figure, I draw again
> R2
>/ \
> /\
> R1 R4-R5
> \/
>\ /
> R3
>
>
> Link
> 1-2 : Bandwidth = 10M, delay = 10ms
> 2-4 : Bandwidth = 20M, delay = 5ms
> 1-3 : Bandwidth = 20M, dela
Hi,
By default EIGRP uses 2 metric: Bandwidth and Delay to calculate routes. It
is recomended that we should not change the Actual Bandwith, but we can
change the interface delay for the traffic enginering purposes.
The metric is : Min Bandwidth + Cumulative Delay.
This can end up with a probl
Thanks Phil
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=38036&t=37768
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I did a search and came across this question posted about 2 weeks ago. But I
did not get the answer I need.
Could anyone have a link stating the default delay for different types of
Interfaces ? Thanks a lot.
By the way, Cisco is marketing that EIGRP can do route selection based on
current Load,
Steven A. Ridder wrote:
>
> I believe the delay is by default set on the interface by the
> router based
> on the type of link it is. I'm sure there's charts on CCO
> somewhere. You
> can change this info on the interface with the delay command,
> which is the
> recommended way of changing a me
Chinh Pham-Tuong wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I am repair to take CCNP examination , please help me
> the `web site` that includes `question and answer`
> about CCNP
> Thanks a lot
> PTC
www.selftest.com --> Great, very similar to REAL exam
www.boson.com --> Good , but harder than real Cisco exam
Circusnuts wrote:
>
> Are you sure IS-IS is on CCNP routing ??? If you follow the
> history of
> IS-IS, it speaks to why we know more about OSPF.
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/Support/PSP/psp_view.pl?p=Internetworking:ISIS
>
> All the best !!!
> Phil
Thank you for your question (asking
Cisco Breaker wrote:
>
> I implemented OSPF load balancing but never done unequal load
> balancing. My
> customer wants Unequal loadbalancing on Motorola routers. As I
> know Unequal
> load balancing cant be implemented on Cisco without policy-map?
> Any
> suggestions or any info?
>
> Best regar
10 matches
Mail list logo
