Netflow, IP Accounting and RMON [7:62489]

Dear All, Can anyone share some useful links for me to explain the above items? I am quite confused about them. Thanks in advance. rgds, Ivan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62489t=62489 -- FAQ, list archives, and

RE: OT-Netscreen 5xp VPN very slow [7:62461]

William, I just pointed out the one of the possible architecture. VPN gateway I mentioned may be other vendors that can work with netscreen like checkpoint... Any problems on my thought? Ivan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62559t=62461

RE: OT-Netscreen 5xp VPN very slow [7:62461]

Do you think it is the LAN negotiation problem? As 5XP only have 10M interface. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62564t=62461 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html

RE: QOS Question [7:62351]

Hi, CBWFQ will meet your requirement. If no VPN traffic, the rest will fill the line. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62565t=62351 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

RE: OT-Netscreen 5xp VPN very slow [7:62461]

Hi, Did you check the NS-5XP log? Also, if you place your PC behind the NS and access internet, what's the path of your traffic? Simply PC- FW- cable modem- Internet OR PC- FW( VPN gateway ) - cable modem - VPN gateway - Internet? BUT you mentioned 3DES, if NS is just using as a Firewall,

RE: QoS suggestion [7:60994]

Hi, I have the following testing setup but it looks like the LLQ does not work. Can you have a look on it? When the 256k link was congested. Why I ping the prec. 5 packet behind the 256k line it only have the same response time with default ping? 128k--- FR 256k Attached 256k router

RE: FR Low Latency Queuing (LLQ) [7:59820]

Hi, Is it a MUST to configure 'fragmentation' (under 1.5M wan link) when enabling LLQ (for voip over frame-relay)? How about if One side connection is FR but another is just a simply leased line? Thanks. rgds, ivan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=60939t=59820

QoS suggestion [7:60994]

Hi, If I want to set the voice traffic have high priority and the rest will use fair queue, which cisco queuing method can achieve it? The hardware is 17xx or 26xx. Thanks. It looks like the LLQ or CBWFQ will have guaranteed bandwidth feature during congestion but seems not the solution I am

RE: FR Low Latency Queuing (LLQ) [7:59820]

Hi, I got the following information during debug. 128K_LL#debug priority Priority output queueing debugging is on 128K_LL# 3d01h: now 263877385 tokens 16000 pak_size 12032 max_token_limit 16000 3d01h: now 263877750 tokens 16000 pak_size 12032 max_token_limit 16000 3d01h: now 263877754 tokens

simple network setup [7:59937]

Hi, I just thinking a simple question for a while... If I have only single router with 2 serial connection to Single ISP and no BGP was configured. Can inbound and outbound traffic be load balanced by only using 2 static routes on both routers? Also, what happen if either link is down? any

RE: FR Low Latency Queuing (LLQ) [7:59820]

Hi All, Thanks all information. I am a little bit confused about LLQ. Below is my understanding after digesting some documentation and feedback from others. Please correct me if I'm wrong. 1. LLQ=PQ+CBWFQ and PQ is defined by using 'priority' 2. if using 'bandwidth', then I'm not using LLQ. What

RE: FR Low Latency Queuing (LLQ) [7:59820]

Hi, Thanks your information. My goal is to make sure from certain source ip (eg, voice gateway) to have guaranteed bandwidth under link congestion. Under normal cases, it can up to 128k. Therefore, 'rate-limit' is not my solution. Due to limited resources, pc2 will upload dummy ftp traffic to

FR Low Latency Queuing (LLQ) [7:59820]

Hi, I would like to configure QoS by using FR LLQ. I have the following network test lab. pc1 --| ---router1FR network-router FTP server pc2---| I want to test the LLQ feature, ie, fixed bandwidth allocated to certain taffic. I tested with the following steps 1.

RE: HSRP and BGP [7:59735]

Dear All, Thanks all useful information. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!!! rgds, ivan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59777t=59735 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

HSRP and BGP [7:59735]

Hi, I have 2 routers configured with HSRP and running BGP with single ISP. For outbound traffic, it will go through the Active HSRP router. How about Inbound traffic? Can the Inbound traffic be 'load shared'? (The ISP already make the same preference on our route advertised) Or the Inbound

Re: HSRP and BGP [7:59735]

Hi All, Thanks all your response. Now two routers adverise same block /24 to the isp. I found that they are 'load shared' in this sense. Only 1 link is the active for Inbound. For example, if I download files from outside, inbound is using say link1 and link2 is idle and no packet coming in.

RE: IP to ATM QoS [7:58784]

Thanks wanabe, would you mind sending me email address as I have another QoS question (on FR)? I want to have your advice too. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=59263t=58784 -- FAQ, list archives,

RE: IP to ATM QoS [7:58784]

Hi, Thanks your details information again. However, is it possible to do QoS based on IP precedence? (Our customer voice-gateway CPE already rewrite the value to 5, so we want to make use of this to implement QoS. Also, we checked that the rest of data traffic will have default precedence value

RE: IP to ATM QoS [7:58784]

Hi, Thanks your advice again. I am just trying the method to provide Per-VC QoS based on IP header information (in our case is IP precedence). From cisco documentation, I found WRED, Set-CLP, WFQ/CBWFQ/LLQ will proivde IP-to-ATM CoS. From your comment, you recommend use queueing method to do

RE: IP to ATM QoS [7:58784]

Hi, In fact, the packet classification/marking was made in CPE side. The voice paket will have IP precedence 5 while normal packet will have default value (precedence 0). The network setup is a trial to test the impact of WRED. As I read through cisco documentation about IP-to-ATM CoS, it covers

FR switch QoS [7:58964]

Hi All, Anyone have experience/idea to deploy QoS on FR switch (Cisco router configured as FR switch)? I have 2 DLCI configured on serial interface and want to have ONE DLCI,eg, DLCI 200 have higher priority when the link congested. Attached the configuration summary for reference. interface

IP to ATM QoS [7:58784]

Dear All, I have two Cisco 7206 with IOS 12.2(11)T and connnected them directly through ATM-PA3 Server --- router1--- (ATM PVC)--- router 2 Client ATM PVC will be the bottleneck of the netwok as Server/Client are connected to routers through FE. Before I configured Per-VC WRED, the FTP

RE: Multicast Traffic Question [7:57932]

Hi, Try this http://www-mice.cs.ucl.ac.uk/multimedia/software/ Good Luck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58863t=57932 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report