RE: whats the difference [7:21195]

My recommendation for a primary study source for CCIE written would be the Caslow book. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=21201&t=21195 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisc

Re: Book club [7:6811]

I had a little trouble with the "tcbc" part of booksonline, but I called (317) 541-8920 and they got everything strightened out to my satisfaction. --Original Message-- From: "Michael L. Williams" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: June 4, 2001 1:00:30 PM GMT Subject: Re: Book club [7:6811] A

Re: CCIE #7354 - for Jeff McCoy [7:3998]

Huh? For future reference, when someone achieves something significant, the correct response is "CONGRATULATIONS!". I don't know what our friend does for a living, but if I can pass the CCIE lab on the second try, I'll be very pleased with myself. --Original Message-- From: "Q" To:

RE: Change EIGRP routing path [7:1048]

I was tempted to call him a SAGE, but that would mean he doesn't do Ethernet! --Original Message-- From: "Chuck Larrieu" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: April 18, 2001 4:38:20 AM GMT Subject: RE: Change EIGRP routing path [7:1048] Best to modify the interface bandwidth parameter. Don't thi

Re: EIGRP clarification

It reminds me more of "Life of Brian", where Brian tells the multitude "You're all individuals! You're all different!" A single voice in the crowd replies "I'm not". --Original Message-- From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: March 29, 2001 6:30:18

RE: Here's an easy one

I'm sure the group will tell me if I put my foot in my mouth, but: Multicast *destination* MAC addresses start with 01-00-5E --Original Message-- From: "Williamson, Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: February 23, 2001 3:23:34 PM GMT Subject: Here's an easy one Ok so

Re: CCIE R&S Going to be Replaced..!!

You mean the same as a duck. --Original Message-- From: "Rodgers Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: February 14, 2001 6:02:58 AM GMT Subject: Re: CCIE R&S Going to be Replaced..!! Witches or not, think about this. Cisco is end of lifing the 2500 series this year. S

RE: Written Tomorrow..

Ryan, You know what you need to know - noe it's up to them to ask the right questions. Good Luck --Original Message-- From: "Sheahan, Ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: January 26, 2001 4:27:49 PM GMT Subject: Written Tomorrow.. Group, With

RE: Propagation speed is NOT the speed of light

ed of light Was "Re: FWD: RE: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU" >At 03:37 PM 1/22/01, Jack Williams wrote: > >>The propagation delay for Ethernet must not be greater than 512 bit times or >>you'll get late collisions (as Tim said). Since the speed of light is >>co

Re: FWD: RE: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU

to this link and go to 100BaseT Operation. http://www.ieng.com/cpress/cc/td/cpress/fund/ith2nd/it2407.htm#xtocid2172310 >>>Brian >From: Jack Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Jack Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: FWD: RE: EASY ?? F

FWD: RE: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU

I didn't care much for either of those choices. The propagation delay for Ethernet must not be greater than 512 bit times or you'll get late collisions (as Tim said). Since the speed of light is constant and 10-baseT bits last 10 times longer than 100-baseT bits, that directly influences how lon