I didn't care much for either of those choices.
The propagation delay for Ethernet must not be greater than 512 bit times or
you'll get late collisions (as Tim said). Since the speed of light is
constant and 10-baseT bits last 10 times longer than 100-baseT bits, that
directly influences how long of a cable you can run down and back!
That sounded like Nonsense, didn't it?
------Original Message------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timothy Metz)
To: Alvarado Jesus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: January 22, 2001 7:43:48 PM GMT
Subject: RE: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU
It's B.
I think we just had this discussion not too long ago, it was quite a long
thread with a lot of discussion on slot time (or the Cisco equiv term).
Tim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Alvarado Jesus
> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 8:11 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: EASY ?? FOR MOST OF YOU
>
>
> The network span of a 100Base-T Network (205) meters is approx. 10 times
> smaller than the network span of a 10Base-T network (2500) meters Because
> ....
>
> A) , Higher speed data signals attenuate more quickly and so cannot be
> transmitted that far
>
>
> B) . Both Networks have minimum frame sizes of 64 bytes and the network
> spans must be tied directly to the minimum frame transmission
> time to avoid
> collisions.
>
> _________________________________
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
