hi
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, [iso-8859-1] Carlos Márquez wrote:
|Can I download the IOS from a router and upload it on another router?
yip, that is taking into account that the IOS is correct for that router.
|router 1: copy flash tftp
|router 2: copy tftp flash
|
|and then the router 2 will boot w
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Chuck Larrieu wrote:
|By "telnet port" do you mean TCP port 23. Or do you mean the VTY's
|themselves?
|
|If the latter, the most effective way is to require a login but set no
|password.
|Eg
|
|Line vty 0 4
|Login
anyone know if you can _disable_ telnet to a cisco and only ss
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Chuck Larrieu wrote:
|There is no option "no service telnet" on the IOS I have available to me.
:-) that was just an example of something that would be nice.
|Your choice would then become an access-list denying telnet to appropriate
|router interfaces. You can also apply ac
hi
On Sat, 5 May 2001, EA Louie wrote:
|If you have the right version of IOS, you can
|transport input ssh
that works :-)
thanks
--
jacques
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3293&t=3237
--
FAQ, list archives,
On Sat, 5 May 2001, Brian Dennis wrote:
|Anyone know how to get to a Cisco router remotely that doesn't have an IP
|address configured on it? Going in through a console, aux or async line
|doesn't count.
cool so we can do this through a sync interface :-)
use ip helper-address, just tested it
On Sat, 5 May 2001, ElephantChild wrote:
|Read the question again. What helper address are you going to configure,
|if your target router doesn't have any IP address assigned to any of its
|interfaces?
router b (no config)
|
| sync interface
|
router a (config with access to the world)
yo
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Jason wrote:
|It has already BEEN done !! :-)
got a url for us ?
--
jacques
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3363&t=3362
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.c
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Jacques Atlas wrote:
||It has already BEEN done !! :-)
|
|got a url for us ?
http://www.mcvax.org/~koen/uClinux-cisco2500/
--
jacques
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3364&t=3362
--
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Curtis Call wrote:
|In other words always use authentication.
i dont think the authentication in clear text is going to help,
the solution from the vendor is to run HSRP with IPSec.
--
jacques
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3557&t=3534
hi
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
|Also, instead of using HSRP you could use the Virtual Router Redundancy
|Protocol (VRRP) defined in RFC 2338. VRRP is the standards-track
|replacement for HSRP. The Security Considerations section explains
|authentication options, including us
hi
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
|I'm surprised it's not in more products???
being surprised is something that i am getting used to ;-)
--
jacques
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=3674&t=3534
--
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Michael Cohen wrote:
|How does one go upon "penetrating" the internal VLAN on a switch while only
|having access to the external VLAN and not traversing the PIX in the middle?
i would also be interted in finding out the theory behind this.
|I have heard the response from num
hi
On Tue, 8 May 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|event of just the right failure/misconfiguration, someone could
|theoretically re-configure the switch to do bad things.
failure or misconfiguration has a direct fault which has to do with the
owner.
the switch doing something which people do no
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Drew Simonis wrote:
|Some decent reads:
|
|http://mlarchive.ima.com/firewalls/1999/4507.html
|http://packetstorm.securify.com/9909-exploits/vlan_security.txt
anyone want to confirm this for 65xx ?
--
jacques
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7
On Wed, 9 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|Do you disagree based on the idea that you can blame someone
|when a problem occurs? While it may be nice to know you can
|point a finger at someone when there are problems, I believe its
|better to eliminate the source of the problem to begin with.
On Wed, 9 May 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|For example, what if a bug occured under certain network
|conditions that caused a switch to lose its VLAN configuration,
|even though the config showed they were there?
that is like saying what happens if the router drop a route or even a
packe
16 matches
Mail list logo
