the route-map, because it contains no match and is a permit
statement, is going to act like a "permit ip any any" at the end of an
access-list. So anything that doesn't match sequence #10 will definitely
match #20 and be sent out serial1 (once the 'set' command
it exists and is
responding) will answer the broadcast ARP with it's own MAC address, thus
giving the sending host a valid layer-3 to layer-2 address mapping.
Hope this helps.
Jamie Byrne
At 04:35 PM 7/3/00 -0400, m. jean stockton wrote:
>Great Question!!!Seems that the only thin
And you really shouldn't be seeing any FCS errors...at least on a regular
basis. These mean that the frames are getting corrupted on the wire,
typically the result of a cable problem.
Jamie Byrne
At 08:46 PM 5/16/00 +0200, ElephantChild wrote:
>On 16 May 2000, Kevin Welch wrote:
&g
I've only seen this happen occasionally, and each time I chalked it up to file corruption during the transfer. On all occasions, deleting and squeezing the image, then copying it to flash again did not see the same checksum error.
Jamie Byrne
At 11:47 PM 5/15/00 -0100, Circusnuts
In both implementations, the return packets are going to be ICMP TTL
exceeded's.
Jamie Byrne
At 01:28 PM 5/11/00 -0500, Mark Odiorne wrote:
> Yes, Tony, you are correct. These "probes" are the ICMP ping packets with
>some fiddling of the Time To Live counters. The messag
5 matches
Mail list logo