This should say it all.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/556/5.html
-Eric
-Original Message-
From: Kwock99 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 10:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Access-list & NAT [7:31152]
Hi,
If I have access-list and NAT in my router, a
No. However, I took the test, and failed it with a 755, and they do ask a
lot of GUI questions. Specifically, to do this function do you click on
this than click on this or, click on this than click on that. Pretty
brutal. I completed my CCNP almost a year ago and passed my MCNS exam about
3
IP protocol 50 and UDP port 500. If you are doing AH you also need ip
protocol 51.
-Eric
-Original Message-
From: Leonardo Borda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 12:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: question about VPN-IPSEC and NAT [7:30694]
Hello,
Could be DNS problem. Try going to http://198.133.219.25/
This is Cisco.com.
Probably not a NAT/PAT issue.
Regards,
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Larry Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 9:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NAT problems. [7:30679]
I
When the frame has the DE bit set that is only telling the Frame-Relay
switch that if we experience congestion in our network the frames that have
the DE bit set are the frames that will be discarded first. If you are
seeing no FECNs or BECNs that sounds to me like you are probably working
with a
I thought I sent this out earlier. I may be mistaken.
-Eric
-Original Message-
From: Lange, Eric
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 9:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: /31 subnet. [7:27742]
Sorry. Looks like 12.2(2)T.
-Eric
-Original Message-
From: VoIP Guy [mailto
Sorry. Looks like 12.2(2)T.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122newft/122
t/122t2/ft31addr.htm#xtocid104191
-Eric
-Original Message-
From: VoIP Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 8:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: /31 s
It's wasn't supported until 12.2(4)T.
Check it out. This is from a 1750 running 12.2(4)T:
> interface Loopback9
> ip address 111.11.1.1 255.255.255.254
It works!
-Eric
-Original Message-
From: VoIP Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 8:34 AM
To: [EMAIL P
I think this can sum it up.
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3021.html
-Eric
-Original Message-
From: VoIP Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 7:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: /31 subnet. [7:27742]
Maybe I'm missing something, but there are only 2 useab
The ip helper-address command is your buddy. The router can convert a UDP
broadcast packet into a unicast and route the packet to the appropriate
network that the DHCP server resides on.
-Eric
-Original Message-
From: Logan, Harold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 26,
e7phem7er7al (i-fem'?r-?l)
adj.
Lasting for a markedly brief time: "There remain some truths too ephemeral
to be captured in the cold pages of a court transcript" (Irving R. Kaufman).
Living or lasting only for a day, as certain plants or insects do.
n.
A markedly short-lived thing.
I needed to l
I don't think you want to use the 'host' command when specifying a subnet.
Try this:
access-list acl_out permit tcp 212.113.2.0 255.255.255.0 host
124.49.114.6 eq ftp
-Eric
-Original Message-
From: John Zei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 12:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PR
John,
Most of the traffic shaping I have done is with data only. T1 to 56k for
example. The rules may be very different (and I'm sure they are) while
doing VoIP.
Traffic shaping a T1 to a 56K is pretty strait foreword. I try and follow
the 1/8th rule when configuring my bc value. I also al
13 matches
Mail list logo
