hen I am all for it.
High standards can generate high salaries in some instances, :). I lived
too long as a struggling artist and love the benefits. ;)
Kim
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: 2002/06/30 Sun PM 08:37:59 EDT
> To: "LongTrip"
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECT
On the TAC site there is an Error Message Decoder (account needed). It is
great for helping you with the generated errors.
Kim
>
> From: "Reza"
> Date: 2002/07/01 Mon AM 03:36:04 EDT
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Unknown Error [7:47822]
>
> Hi Group
> I got this message from my Cisco 36
Do you mean DPT/SRP? If so, it is not that difficult to understand, from a
support point of view. My last employer had DPT/SRP rings deployed in
different cities. It made moving information around easier and less
expensive. From a technical point of view I would have to reread the
documentation
Tuesday morning I am writing the VPN portion of the CSS1. I thought it
would be a good idea to write it while the course I took is still fresh in
my mind.
I have gone over the course material and searched through CCO looking for
other relevant data that may happen to be on the exam.
Has anyone
Thanks...
For me that will have to be a next year thing. :)
Kim
>
> From: "Oleg Oz"
> Date: 2002/06/30 Sun PM 04:50:33 EDT
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: RE: Passed CCIE written at Networkers in San D [7:47791]
>
> Sorry,
> I should have been more clear. What I meant to say was
Chalk it up to the newbie to ask
What is the PS CCIE book?
Kim
>
> From: "Frank Merrill"
> Date: 2002/06/30 Sun PM 12:44:23 EDT
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Passed CCIE written at Networkers in San Diego [7:47764]
>
> > BTW: I highly recommend attending the PS session (o
Recently I had the pleasure of taking one of the courses CSVPN via a
training partner. Most of the course material is echo'd on the cisco site.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/secur_c/scprt4/index.htm
If you step down a layer from that directory you will fi
Comments in line.
>
> From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer"
> Date: 2002/06/23 Sun PM 08:19:23 EDT
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Re: HSRP [7:47177]
>
> At 02:22 PM 6/23/02, LongTrip wrote:
> >hmmm maybe there was a misunderstanding on my part of an ear
versation, not the return path (although implementational specifics
might
> force them to address the return path in some circumstances).
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "LongTrip"
> To:
> Sent: 23 June 2002 2:22 pm
> Subject: Re: Re: HSRP [7:4
o the VRRP RFC. VRRP is the open standard
> intended to replace the several proprietary methods that now exist. The
> first couple of pages provide a good explanation and a good background of
> the problem to be solved.
>
> ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2338.txt
>
> Tom
>
So you are saying the client never sees the MAC address of RouterA? It only
sees the MAC address of the "Virtual Router"?
Kim
>
> From: "Michael L. Williams"
> Date: 2002/06/23 Sun AM 11:29:24 EDT
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: HSRP [7:47177]
>
> This isn't quite right. See comments
Tim,
If you have not hard configured the MAC address then it will be the MAC of
the "virtual router". This MAC address is a combination of 3 things; vendor
code, well known HSRP virtual MAC address, and the group number of the
active router.
Below are listed some sources of information.
http://
12 matches
Mail list logo
