in my experience, arouter with more than 32megs will do well with the full
internet table. Cisco recommends to use 64megs at least...
with a E1, the full internet table will took a couple minutes to download...
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been formed. For more information go to
http://www.gro
it means that a frame relay switch is sending you an advise to slow down the
traffic load on this dlci...
a frame relay switch sends a FECN to the destination dte and a BECN to the
source dte when it encounters congestion somwhere un the switching path.
you can use th interface command
frame-re
the easy way
type show run in the router A,
copy all the output to notepad
go to the other router
type a write erase (all the config will be lost, you must be at the console
port :) )
reboot the router B
once it has booted, tipe 'n' to skip the auto-setup
go to config mode with "conf t"
cha
you can use "clear line" set of commands
> -Mensaje original-
> De: SH Wesson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Enviado el: Monday, September 18, 2000 4:25 PM
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Asunto: disconnect telnet
>
> How can I disconnect another user who is currently telnet into the r
i suspect that the problem is at the FR switch...
if you remember the dlci status are:
active: both ends and switch working
inactive: near end and switch working, remote end dead
deleted: the switch does not recognice the dlci number.
i can see that in one of your routers you have an ACTIVE dlci
you are right. only especific NICS will support this feature.
i don't know about ANY company that is suing this technology. I can remember
that it is based in an MAGIC (it's the real name...) ethernet packet
destined to yopur MAC Address.
Maybe there is more info at 3com's site
> -Mensaje or
sorry, it will not work with the current IOS versions...
> -Mensaje original-
> De: whatshakin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Enviado el: Monday, September 18, 2000 11:37 PM
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Asunto: 3600 module NM-1FE1R2W
>
> I have a Cisco 3600 NM-1FE1R2W module I woul
last week i installed a router (7200). the full bgp table occupied 11.5 mb.
that's all. in 128 mb you can put the bgp table of the entire galaxy...
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Guyler, Rik [EESUS] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Enviado el: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 2:06 PM
> Para: John Ka
you can put an explicit neighboring between the routers to avoid using
multicast. then you need to put a coumple conduits to let ospf passtrough.
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Nabil Fares [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Enviado el: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 2:38 PM
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTE
jeje, all you have to do, is to block the initial connection to the napster
server. this happaens in the tcp port 8875, gnuttella on tcp 6346, icq 2000
tcp 5190, icq tcp and udp 4000. all are dest. ports, of course.
ah, if you want to block the new "Scour exchange", block the connection with
the
i think dest addr., dest mac, next hop addr.
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Ejay Hire [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Enviado el: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 6:26 PM
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Asunto: ACRC Objective question.
>
> Here's a question that was in a study guide I couldn't
let me explain
you must make a conduit that let pass the ospf unicast traffic from JUST one
router to the other. and if you are really paranoid you can put md5 auth on
both routers too.
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Howard C. Berkowitz [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Enviado el: Tuesday,
TECTED]]
> Enviado el: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 7:35 PM
> Para: Omar Baceski; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Asunto: Re: PIX and OSPF
>
> Like Howard mentioned early. Why would you do this?
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Omar Baceski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
this is not my scenario.
maybe there are no internet routers, and both are internals. just ask Nabil
Fares [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> -Mensaje original-
> De: John Kaberna [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Enviado el: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 8:40 PM
> Para: Omar Bac
September 19, 2000 10:31 PM
> Para: Omar Baceski; 'cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail)'
> Asunto: RE: link down problem
>
> But a loopback of the interface shows line protocol down as well
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
you're right. i have had a lot of trouble last month because the manager
SAYs that it has sent some commands but looking at the pix, the config was
not complete. i suggest the old and kind telnet...
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Wibowo Nur Susetio [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Enviado el: T
well, if you look at the load meter, it is clear that it is a very congested
line (over 87% last five minutes). if you got peeks of 100% of utli. the
rest of the packets will drop until the load descends below the bandwidht
the line can handle. 2 solutions:
1- use some sort of queuing for the to c
Frank,
I think you forgot to put the
ppp chap password cisco
It will not authenticate without it
Omar
-Mensaje original-
De: Frank B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 4:17 AM
Para: Santarsiero, Bill; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Me @ Work; [EMAIL PROTECTE
18 matches
Mail list logo
