hi,
i have a requirement that says that i need to have a redundant cisco switch
.. i.e. there is a LAN and the if the switch fails .. the other switch
should take over. this is possible in the cisco 6000 series of switches ...
but is there some lower end solution .. that costs less and also my
re
pro's and con's
associated
> to it.
>
> Pushkar Shirolkar wrote:
>
> > hi,
> >
> > i have a requirement that says that i need to have a redundant cisco
switch
> > .. i.e. there is a LAN and the if the switch fails .. the other switch
> > should take over. thi
hi friends,
i have a strange prob. i have a cisco load director 416 ... and have a very
simple config. i have a firewall whose one interface is to the internet and
one to the internal n/w ... as usual .. nothing diff. . and inside on
the n/w i have one load director and 2 web servers which i
yes the conduits have been setup ..
regds
Pushkar
"andy lennon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 8p97lc$net$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8p97lc$net$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> you are going from an outside to an inside on the pix, do you have conuits
> on the pix se
your servers from the LD,
> and try to ping the LD from the PIX DMZ interface. Do a 'show real' and
> 'show virtual' to get some better info than the config.
>
> Let me know how you do from here.
>
> Jeff
>
> ""Pushkar Shirolkar"" &
5 matches
Mail list logo