CISCO SWITCH

2000-10-09 Thread Pushkar Shirolkar
hi, i have a requirement that says that i need to have a redundant cisco switch .. i.e. there is a LAN and the if the switch fails .. the other switch should take over. this is possible in the cisco 6000 series of switches ... but is there some lower end solution .. that costs less and also my re

Re: CISCO SWITCH

2000-10-09 Thread Pushkar Shirolkar
pro's and con's associated > to it. > > Pushkar Shirolkar wrote: > > > hi, > > > > i have a requirement that says that i need to have a redundant cisco switch > > .. i.e. there is a LAN and the if the switch fails .. the other switch > > should take over. thi

cisco load director

2000-09-07 Thread Pushkar Shirolkar
hi friends, i have a strange prob. i have a cisco load director 416 ... and have a very simple config. i have a firewall whose one interface is to the internet and one to the internal n/w ... as usual .. nothing diff. . and inside on the n/w i have one load director and 2 web servers which i

Re: cisco load director

2000-09-07 Thread Pushkar Shirolkar
yes the conduits have been setup .. regds Pushkar "andy lennon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 8p97lc$net$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8p97lc$net$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > you are going from an outside to an inside on the pix, do you have conuits > on the pix se

Re: cisco load director

2000-09-08 Thread Pushkar Shirolkar
your servers from the LD, > and try to ping the LD from the PIX DMZ interface. Do a 'show real' and > 'show virtual' to get some better info than the config. > > Let me know how you do from here. > > Jeff > > ""Pushkar Shirolkar"" &