Re: DHCP- Advise / Suggestions Apprciated

2001-02-23 Thread R. Scott Sutor
The problem you are having is due do DHCP functionality, not cisco/helper address related. The DHCP server which does not have a scope created on it is issuing a NACK for the IP request to the client. This is probably happening first because the NACKing server can tell that it is not configured

Re: [Re: Windows NT DHCP with multiple Scopes]

2001-03-03 Thread R. Scott Sutor
Two factors converge to make this work. 1.) The IP Helper address Converts the broadcast request to a unicast. The destination being the helper address, and the source address being the Router interface that received the request *Very Important* 2.) The NT server is conf

Re: redundant MSFC synchronization problem [7:12360]

2001-07-23 Thread R. Scott Sutor
I went around about this with Cisco for some time. I made them change their docs. See the line: "Caution Dual MSFCs in a single chassis are designed to be used in redundant mode only and you must configure both MSFCs identically; they must have the exact same configuration. Table 22-2 summariz

Re: Staic Routes on 1605 Router [7:52340]

2002-08-30 Thread R. Scott Sutor
Another silly suggestion... Are the Ethernet interfaces up? They must be "no shut"ted as part of your config. Your config as you list it looks right to me. -S. ""Craig Robertson"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi guys, > I am having a problem with routing on