RE: CCIE Number [7:44294]

2002-05-15 Thread Rob Ehlers
i believe the first # issued was 1025... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44297&t=44294 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure viol

RE: Upgrade IOS on 2504, Please assist [7:44135]

2002-05-13 Thread Rob Ehlers
Do you want to do it via x-modem for some reason? If not, I'd recommend pulling the image from a tftp server over the network instead. here is a link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/130/sw_upgrade_proc_flash.shtml Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44136&t=44135

RE: ARP problems, anyone? [7:44108]

2002-05-13 Thread Rob Ehlers
When PC2 attempts to send a response, it checks its routing table first. No default gateway, no route to host. Done. It won't check the arp table, because it the process stops at layer 3 (IP) when it can't find a route to PC1. Instead of adding a static arp entry, you could add just a static ip r

RE: BGP Multihoming Policy [7:43962]

2002-05-12 Thread Rob Ehlers
You'll probably need to use as prepends to control traffic in both directions from the ISP side... To control user's OUTBOUND traffic patterns: On the BGP connections to these users, for any of the less preferred routes (from AS2 and AS3), you want to

RE: BGP Multihoming Policy [7:43962]

2002-05-11 Thread Rob Ehlers
on the user's router you'll want to have them apply a route-map to routes from AS1 that sets the local pref to 200 (or something higher than the default of 100). Those routes will then be used over any from the other AS's for outbound traffic from that user. If the user wants to control inbound t

RE: Reg: OSPF [7:43726]

2002-05-11 Thread Rob Ehlers
We ran OSPF on a realtively small network (15 sites, about 2-5 network devices per site). All 2500's with 4MB of RAM. Not even close to taxing the routers. This was at an ISP with about a /21 worth of class Cs spread out in a not-so-intelligent manner between the sites. Message Posted at: http:/

RE: R/S recert [7:43890]

2002-05-11 Thread Rob Ehlers
I took the R/S IP Cert about a year ago. It was fairly straightforward. Cisco has the requirements on their website. If you feel you need to review, read through Routing TCP/IP Vol I by Jeff Doyle. You can also read the BGP and multicast sections in Routing TCP/IP Vol II. That should give you a pr

Re: 1924 Switch: Takes long time to ping device af [7:43903]

2002-05-11 Thread Rob Ehlers
PAgP (Etherchannel) negotiation can also take up about 15 seconds. Turn it off with: hostname(config)# port-channel mode off Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43941&t=43903 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription inf

RE: Give up...Cannot ping from one spoke to anothe [7:43795]

2002-05-10 Thread Rob Ehlers
Sounds like bootcamp lab #1 to me... heh. Try policy-based routing on the frame interfaces of the spokes. You want it to change the next hop to point back to the hub router's IP... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43808&t=43795 --