Re: OSPF configuration - Please help

2000-06-07 Thread Robert John Lake
Hi, Router B is misconfigured.. The ospf process should contain.. 192.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 area 0 I would put the loopback addresses in as well and not this network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 <-- this does not even have an area assigned.. Robert Daniel Ma wrote: > > In router A,

Re: PAT vs NAT

2000-06-06 Thread Robert John Lake
Hi Duncan, With NAT you will need 100 ip address to allow 100 connections or you can limit the amount of web connectivity by only allowing say 10 connections. However with PAT you only need one outside address because you are using the port addresses. Regards Robert Duncan Maccubbin wrote: >

Re: IP fragmentation

2000-06-06 Thread Robert John Lake
Hi Larry, In the dslw packet there is a field that is calll largest frame size (L) Largest Frame Size---Carries the largest frame size bits across the DLSw connection. This field is implemented to ensure that the two end-stations always negotiate a frame size to be used on a circuit that does no

Re: ip unnumbered

2000-06-06 Thread Robert John Lake
Hi, Here you go... To conserve IP addresses, configure the asynchronous interfaces as unnumbered, and assign the IP address of the loopback interface or an ethernet interface to them. ! interface ethernet 0 ip address 192.0.0.5 255.255.255.0 ! interface serial 0 ip unnumbered ethernet 0

Re: Cisco's uOne ???!!!!!

2000-06-05 Thread Robert John Lake
Hi, I agree, but if its a quick query then I may be able to answer it for you. Robert Tim O'Brien wrote: > > If I were you I would place a call to TAC. They will help you get this up > and running and will have much more expertise than someone on the list who > may have implemented it once bef

Re: setting mtu size on a 2611

2000-06-05 Thread Robert John Lake
Hi, Why do you want to change the MTU size You are going to walk into serious issues if you do. Robert "Clark, Jason" wrote: > > Good Morning > > I am trying to manually set the MTU size on a 2611 and am receiving the > following message % Interface Ethernet0/0 does not support user set

Re: BGP ?

2000-06-05 Thread Robert John Lake
Hi, You can use a Policy Route Map and using the community attribute. This will, overcome the transminssion of ISP to another ISP via your network.. Rob Chris Allen wrote: > > Yes you can!!! I am going to assume that each AS is a different ISP??? So > the only thing keeping you from doing th