ccbootcamp written prep material?

2001-03-30 Thread Scott Hoover
Anybody have any experience with the CCIE written prep. material from ccbootcamp.com? Is it a fair measure of being prepared for the written exam? Thanks, Scott CCNP _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report mi

Re: port number list on DOS [7:2809]

2001-05-01 Thread Scott Hoover
I think you are looking for "netstat". Try "nestat ?" at the command line for the options. Scott ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > OK, I have a DOS question that really is relevant to Cisco networking (sort > of. ;-) This came up a couple

Passed CCIE written on first try this morning [7:3066]

2001-05-03 Thread Scott Hoover
Passed the written on the first try this morning with flying colors. Very, very tricky exam. I used Routing TCP/IP by Doyle, TR white paper by Rossi, Boson 1 and 2, and various info. from CCO. THEIR IS NO SHORTCUT TO THIS EXAM! Don't rely on the Boson exams--they are good to get you in the rig

Re: very urgent [7:8306]

2001-06-13 Thread Scott Hoover
Remove backup statements for primary and add a floating static pointed out BRI (or dialer) with an adminstrative distance higher than your IGP. Don't forget to redistribute these routes into your IGP. ""Sudhakar Reddy Kanchi"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > seno

RE: BGP issue ??? [7:37730]

2002-03-09 Thread Scott Hoover
I've never tried it with IBGP, but I've used it for EBGP multihop with no problems. -Original Message- From: Ouellette, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2002 1:39 PM To: 'Scott H.' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: BGP issue ??? [7:37730] Thought bgp had a got

Re: FRAME-Relay Hub and Spoke Question [7:16221]

2001-08-15 Thread Scott Hoover
a). yes b). the route statement on the switch should point out the interface on the switch (connected to the hub), this statement has nothing to do with the hub interface (or sub-interfaces). ""Ray Smith"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Guys, > > Correct me if

Re: For FR Grus.... [7:16635]

2001-08-21 Thread Scott Hoover
You can disable inverse arp on each interface on the spokes and then clear the cache. That should prevent the spokes from seeing the unused dlci's, but will require a static map of dlci to ip for each dlci you want to use. ""Cisco Lover"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTE

RE: For FR Grus.... [7:16635]

2001-08-21 Thread Scott Hoover
You might be right, I would have to test in it a lab. Can anybody give confirmation on this? -Original Message- From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 9:44 AM To: Scott Hoover; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: For FR Grus [7:16635] Doesn&#

Re: For FR Grus.... [7:16635]

2001-08-21 Thread Scott Hoover
t 21, 2001 8:10 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: For FR Grus [7:16635] > > > Doesn't disabling inverse arp only take effect on a router reboot? > > > > -Original Message- > From: Scott Hoover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 21 August 2001 15:43

RE: For FR Grus.... [7:16635]

2001-08-21 Thread Scott Hoover
--- From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 9:44 AM To: Scott Hoover; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: For FR Grus [7:16635] Doesn't disabling inverse arp only take effect on a router reboot? -Original Message- From: Scott Hoover [mailto:[EMA

Re: CCIE R/S written Topic?!?? [7:26674]

2001-11-19 Thread Scott Hoover
""Per Bjorklund"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hello! > > I4m about to take the written exam, but one question. Since there is no > appel talk and LANE in the lab and very simpel ISDN does the same apply to > the written exam? > > /regards > Per Message Post

Re: CCIE R/S written Topic?!?? [7:26674]

2001-11-19 Thread Scott Hoover
Check out this link: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/certifications/rsblueprint.html This should tell you everything you want to know. ""Scott Hoover"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > ""Per Bjorklund"

Re: Redistribution Question [7:28374]

2001-12-10 Thread Scott Hoover
IGRP will automatically summarize the route to the classful boundary since it has no connections to that network. If you look at the route table in Chuck's last message, you will see a classful route to the 10.0.0.0 network. ""Hunt Lee"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: how to change the serial port IP of remote end [7:28665]

2001-12-10 Thread Scott Hoover
You need some sort of console connection to the remote router, be it direct connect or dial-up through the aux. port. If you try to do it over the primary circuit, you will lose your connection as soon as you hit enter. ""Rajneesh Yadav"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Question of OSPF Over DDR [7:28666]

2001-12-10 Thread Scott Hoover
By design, hellos and lsa's are surpressed. Do a search on CCO for a demand circuit for further info.. ""[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aaron ZHAO)"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > hi, all > > I have a question about OSPF over DDR. The lab scenario is: > > 1. RTA and RTB co

Re: ISDN Stimulators [7:29787]

2001-12-20 Thread Scott Hoover
This actually sounds kinda kinky--I've been spending way too much time in front of a rack. . .6 weeks to go and counting. ""AlefTec PvtLtd"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi > > Can some one pls suggest me good ISDN Stimulators which i can use in my labs > for

Re: Who said women don't dig routers? [7:29781]

2001-12-20 Thread Scott Hoover
Throw a route filter on it for proctection and your good to go. ""Kaminski, Shawn G"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > A friend of mine sent this to me. I've never seen it so I thought I would > pass it along! If it's already been seen on this list, I apologize for

Re: EIGRP Summary Question [7:31256]

2002-01-08 Thread Scott Hoover
If for some reason one of the routes fails that is being summarized, the packet will match the summary to null 0 and be dropped. This is a safety mechanism so the router doesn't waste cycles on packets it can't route. ""Hunt Lee"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >

tcp reset problem [7:70521]

2003-06-11 Thread Scott Hoover
Running a solaris (v8 I think) box with Lotus Notes on it (new build). We are having a problem with the server immediately sending a reset to clients after receiving the syn. Congestion or errors on the segment are non-existent. I don't control the server so I can't see the logs but I'm dealing

Re: 'It's not the US they want to destroy. It's our arrogance' [7:19665]

2001-09-12 Thread Scott Hoover
Pardon my french, but this is horseshit. We are constantly helping the less fortunate countries of the world. Get off your high horse and analyze the crazy bastards that did this. . .they did not attack military sites that could defend themselves. They went after innocent people who were trying

Re: PPP password [7:19837]

2001-09-13 Thread Scott Hoover
no service password-encryption ""Andy Barkl"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I need to display the PPP password on my ISDN link. > > In the enable mode can I turn off some type of encryption to then display > the encrypted password? Message Posted at: http://

OT-Survey--anybody use AAA to authenticate backup links? [7:21916]

2001-10-03 Thread Scott Hoover
Does anybody use AAA to authenticate ISDN backup links? Thanks! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=21916&t=21916 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report miscond

Re: CCIE Lab procedures [7:26002]

2001-11-13 Thread Scott Hoover
How can they be better? People taking the one day are taking the same exact test as the ones who had the two day. One day people just skip the time consuming basic stuff. ""DAve Diaz"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Rubbish, the IP addressing, IPX addressing i