My two cents - for what it's worth ... first, we all understand the purpose
of this forum, but like in 3D conversations, sometimes the topics veer.
Perhaps we need to redirect things back, but my God, folks - we're human
beings, after all. Just because we're so intimately involved in machinery,
t
Great email, x -- if I was in a position to hire someone right now, you'd be
at the top of my list.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of x
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 9:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Are all the Cisco jobs for CCIEs
Not sure if this is a satisfactory answer, but I believe the convention
harkens back to Kernighan and Ritchie, the inventors of the C programming
language. 0x was an indicator for a hex value; 0 alone was an indicator for
octal. I have no clue why 0d was used for octal in Cisco-ese.
-Origin
Interesting. Yesterday, I just copied the HTML and changed the charset to
US-ASCII and voila - when I browsed it, I could read it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Semion Lisyansky
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Well-described comments on your part, may I add. Perhaps a shade off the
mark, though.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
John Neiberger
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 9:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Focus on RFCs [7:40046]
I think th
5 matches
Mail list logo