First thing I would check is traffic-shaping parameters. Ask your ISP for
_exact_ shaping specs for your PVC. If there is a mismatch on either side,
one of you will drop cells.
Once a single cell drops, you start re-transmitting entire packets... Then
you might drop a cell from the re-transmitt
oes try and connect to an NT
server, it will send the correct information. Also, as others have said,
make sure you have WINS or an LMHOSTS file working to allow them to find the
domain controller(s).
Hope this helps,
Travis Gamble
Systems Engineer
Attache Group Inc.
- Original Message -
By the way... we are unable to implement a full-scale LANE system (with a
LECS and a LES and a BUS and all that jive). I know that would fix it, but
it would introduce new problems in our configuration.
I definitely would appreciate any input.
Regards,
Travis Gamble
___
x27;m sure
support.microsoft.com can help you out with that one), then you won't be
able to communicate with the PDC to authenticate.
Travis Gamble
- Original Message -
From: "Mr. Oletu Hosea Godswill, CCNA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday,
You need an NWHOST file... it goes in the \novell\client32 directory, and is
exactly like a HOSTS file, except for Netware servers and trees...
You only need two lines, if your netware server is at 192.168.1.1:
NAME_OF_YOUR_TREE 192.168.1.1
NAME_OF_YOUR_SERVER 192.168.1.1
That's it.
T
If you have enough external IP addresses, then yes, you can have an entire
subnet be accessible from the outside world. If you check the static
(inside,outside) command, there is a way to specify a network address and
subnet mask for the translation.
However, if you only have a few addresses the
Actually, it causes twice as many bugs... but they're coming out with the
14400 soon...
- Original Message -
From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 7:25 PM
Subject: Re: OT: I love this caveat!
> >Open caveat in 12.1(7):
> >
>
Although most of the latency comes from your wireless link and the ISP
connection, it still doesn't mean you shouldn't optimize the setup a bit.
You mentioned in a later email that the reason for switch2 and 3 is that
they needed more ports. That's fine, and there's nothing wrong with that
type
Although most of the latency comes from your wireless link and the ISP
connection, it still doesn't mean you shouldn't optimize the setup a bit.
You mentioned in a later email that the reason for switch2 and 3 is that
they needed more ports. That's fine, and there's nothing wrong with that
type
Have a look at the Home Network white paper at
http://www.ccprep.com/resources/cc-whitepapers/ccpapers.htm
(watch the word-wrap)
-Travis
""Shawn Sousa"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Yes I've seen thatI guess I should be more specific. Does anyone h
Hi all,
I have a copy of Caslow's Bridges Routers & Switches for CCIEs which I am
using to study for the CCIE written.. but I have the first edition. Can
anyone comment on the amount of new stuff that's been added to the second
edition? Is it worth going out and re-purchasing a book I already h
I haven't tried to install the VPN client on 2000... but the reason for that
is because 2000 supports IPSec already. No need for the client, just set it
up on the box, no additional software should be required.
Travis Gamble
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[
e.
Anyone know of a workaround for that, or do I need to start getting a block
of IPs?
Regards,
Travis Gamble
___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report miscondu
0.0.0.255
Or something to that effect.
Just substitute the # of the protocol in where you would normally put "tcp"
or "udp" or "ip".
Hope this helps,
Travis Gamble
> -Original Message-
> From: George Zhang
> Sent: 31 August 2000 15:33
> To: [EMAIL PR
Nope, the Pix is Intel based. Unfortunately, you would need to have exactly
the same motherboard, NICs and everything in between. Probably is possible,
but you'd need pretty detailed information.
Travis Gamble
- Original Message -
From: "William E Gragido" <[EM
CTRL and ^ (or CTRL, SHIFT and 6...)
Travis
- Original Message -
From: "Sean Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Cisco@Groupstudy. Com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 6:50 PM
Subject: How do I break out of traceroute?
> Hello All,
>
> What's the key combination to bre
ll with anyone?
Any debugging tips?
Regards,
Travis Gamble
___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually Lance was referring to a RIP packet, and it would make sense that a
RIP packet would begin with an extremely low TTL field (of either 1 or 2) so
that it would only be propagated to neighboring routers. You wouldn't want
a routing update to go any further than that.
Travis G
request. When the reply comes back, it does a lookup of the port
it arrives back at, and re-addresses it and forwards it back to the
appropriate internal IP address.
Hope this helps,
Travis Gamble
(Oh, by the way... PAT stands for Port Address Translation, I think)
-Original Message-
From
19 matches
Mail list logo
