Hi Gang,
I have a Pix Firewall 520 and wondered if this was a feature or a
configuration issue on my firwall. We have an entire class C address say
208.184.23.x to use for our network. We use the 192.168.1.x network for our
internal network. I am having problems pinging a machine's Internet ip
Hi there,
I am planning to take two training classes, BSCN and Pix Firewall class.
Can somebody give me a recommendation of a good classroom training
partner? Only comments I have seen in this group is about
GlobalKnowledge. Any other providers or should I go with them for
training. I would l
I know blocking ports isn't really going to stop people who can tunnel
through via http or some other open ports. Are there firewalls that
will look into specific traffic streams and drop connections that are
not really http sessions?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php
Hi All,
Can somebody help me out on configuring one of these setups? I have
research the web and have documentation on getting Pix to work with
Sonicwall using IKE. Basically one side would have a sonicwall while
the other would be the Pix. That would work but my boss wants to use 2
Sonicwall
Hi All,
Does anybody know of a way to setup VPN to bridge traffic between two
LANs using a Cisco router and either a VPN client or something else? I
only have one Cisco router and the other end can be anything. I tried
setting up IPSEC over VPN under Cisco IOS and it works but it doesn't
bridge
Hey,
is there a possibility to set up a router acting
as a radius or tacacs server with local authentication
without external server ?
Please let me know
best regards
Michael
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53621&t=53621
---
Hi All,
I have a production site that has a Class C ip address scheme with /28 block
giving us 16 ip addresses. However, we need additional public ip addresses
and our ISP is unable to provide us with another contiguous block of 32 ip
addresses using this specific network. My firewalls are routin
>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 17:48:33 -0500
From: "MADMAN"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IPX Network Numbering [7:32335]
Reply-To: "MADMAN"
Your second thought is the correct thought. Most customers already
have a plan/addressing scheme and if they don't it's up to the local
field tech a
>
From: "Darrell Newcomb"
X-GroupStudy-Version: 3.1.1a
X-GroupStudy: Network Technical
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Stupid Question [7:32591]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: "Darrell Newcomb"
Precedence: bulk
With the key NT cheap shot being:
It doesn't matter how coherent the file s
9 matches
Mail list logo