Re: %static entry in use, cannot remove [7:31560]

2002-01-11 Thread paul
Just wanted to say thank you all for your help. yes i had to clear up the nat translation table before removing it. worked wonders ;) thanx Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31625t=31560 -- FAQ, list archives, and

%static entry in use, cannot remove [7:31560]

2002-01-10 Thread paul
Hi, can anyone tell me how i go about removing a static entry from the router ?i am using nat (#ip nat inside source static ) , however when i remove that entry i get : %static entry in use, cannot remove . that host is no longer up and i am running out of solutions, any suggestions are

Re: %static entry in use, cannot remove [7:31560]

2002-01-10 Thread c1sc0k1d
clear ip nat trans paul wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, can anyone tell me how i go about removing a static entry from the router ?i am using nat (#ip nat inside source static ) , however when i remove that entry i get : %static entry in use, cannot

Re: %static entry in use, cannot remove [7:31560]

2002-01-10 Thread Steven A. Ridder
Also shut down the local lan interface in case some lan client tries to go out to the internet while you are changing nat. Some busy sites this happens at. And include an * after the trans for all the translations. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

Re: %static entry in use, cannot remove [7:31560]

2002-01-10 Thread AMR
You dont shut down the interface. Just remove the 'ip nat outside' or other such necessary command from the interface. It's far less affecting to the router to remove the nat command than it is to shut down an interface which would possibly cause a change in the route table, forcing

Re: %static entry in use, cannot remove [7:31560]

2002-01-10 Thread Steven A. Ridder
Good point. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: %static entry in use, cannot remove [7:31560]

2002-01-10 Thread Darrell Newcomb
My preference in this is to just scope the translation clearing to just the affected static, then quickly delete the static translation which I think sridder was saying. In particularly busy environments an inbound acl on the internal/external interfaces will keep traffic from triggering the

Re: %static entry in use, cannot remove [7:31560]

2002-01-10 Thread dlci_16
just want to say thanx for all your suggestions. yes, i had to clear up my ip nat translations before removing that entry. thanx. ;) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=31595t=31560 -- FAQ, list archives, and

RE: %static entry in use, cannot remove [7:31560]

2002-01-10 Thread Andrew Larkins
in use, cannot remove [7:31560] clear ip nat trans paul wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi, can anyone tell me how i go about removing a static entry from the router ?i am using nat (#ip nat inside source static ) , however when i remove that ent