RE: 1900 CLI Same as Cat5K? [7:17177]

2001-08-24 Thread Ole Drews Jensen
EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 1:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 1900 CLI Same as Cat5K? [7:17177] Hello, all. I hope I'm not being redundant redundant, but I can't locate this in the archives, so here goes: I haven't had the occasion to do much with either

RE: 1900 CLI Same as Cat5K? [7:17177]

2001-08-24 Thread Daniel Cotts
. Side comment. Todd Lammle's CCNA book ver 2 has a neat 1900 tutorial in an appendix. > -Original Message- > From: Don Claybrook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 1:44 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: 1900 CLI Same as Cat5K? [7:17177] >

RE: 1900 CLI Same as Cat5K? [7:17177]

2001-08-24 Thread Buri, Heather L.
August 24, 2001 1:44 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: 1900 CLI Same as Cat5K? [7:17177] > > Hello, all. > > I hope I'm not being redundant redundant, but I can't locate this in the > archives, so here goes: > > I haven't had the occasion to

1900 CLI Same as Cat5K? [7:17177]

2001-08-24 Thread Don Claybrook
Hello, all. I hope I'm not being redundant redundant, but I can't locate this in the archives, so here goes: I haven't had the occasion to do much with either the Catalyst 5000 or the 1900 series, I've only worked with 2912/24. For purposes of studying for an eventual CCIE lab, are the 'set' an