Here is an interesting challenge, that may not be so obvious to some of
you.
You were told to configure a network as follows:
10.1.1.1/8 router
10.1.1.2/8 hostA gw 10.1.1.1
10.1.1.3/8 hostB gw 10.1.1.1
10.1.1.4/8 hostC gw 10.1.1.1
hostA cannot ping hostB or hostC. hostB a
, December 18, 2000 8:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: A challenge
Here is an interesting challenge, that may not be so obvious to some of
you.
You were told to configure a network as follows:
10.1.1.1/8 router
10.1.1.2/8 hostA gw 10.1.1.1
10.1.1.3/8 hostB gw 10.1.1.1
10.1.1.4/8
an Hosts B and C, so a normal ping would never go to the router and
therefore fail. When the broadcast ping is used, it goes to the router and
is passed on.
-Original Message-
From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 6:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: A
Can you show a "sh ip arp" at your router, and "arp -a" at all your PC
please?
"Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> Here is an interesting challenge, that may not be so obvious to some of
> you.
>
> You were told to configure a network as
try to disable the IP PROXY-ARP on the ethernet interface of the router and
tell me wat will happen
thx
-Original Message-
From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 7:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: A challenge
Here is an interesting challenge, that
stake was made that
produced the results I typed. I am trying to get people to guess what
mistake would cause that.
Brian
>
> Todd
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Brian
> Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 8:07
odd Plambeck
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: A challenge
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Todd Plambeck wrote:
> I do not see anything wrong with hostA pinging hostB. The only thing I
found
> wrong was the 10.1.1.255 address which no one answers. How did you setup
> your lab to test this?
Bel
rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Brian
> Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 10:17 PM
> To: Todd Plambeck
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:RE: A challenge
>
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Todd Plambeck wrote:
>
> > I do not see anyt
t; mistake was made that
> produced the results I typed. I am trying to get
> people to guess what
> mistake would cause that.
>
> Brian
>
>
> >
> > Todd
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
I haven't got a clue! I think A is on the same subnet as B&C but maybe A
hasn't been set up for tcp/ip. Could it be that it's running a different
protocol?
--
Michael S Garcia
CCNA - MCP - CCNP (soon)
Axient Communications
"Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAI
OK so that's not it. I'm stumped...
Michael Garcia
Axient Communications
Phn 602-850-3091
Fax 602-850-4091
-Original Message-
From: ElephantChild [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 2:35 AM
To: NEO
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A challenge
On T
A small question:
it is said that "hostA does get a reply however from all hosts if it pings
10.1.1.255".
But 10.1.1.255 is NOT a broadcast address for 10.0.0.0/8, directed broadcast
should be 10.255.255.255.
Is it simply mistyped number or a clue ;) ?
Alex, CCNP, MCSE
> Remember that A can p
Node A is really just a figment of your imagination because you put too much
cocaine in the crack you smoked that morning? Not really/Just kidding. A is
a printer? No, maybe it has something to do with an access list that was set
up wrong...Hmmm. I'm reaching I know! Oh my God I need a Life!!! Let
Seems that at host A, you set the IP/mask as 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.255,
gateway point to 10.1.1.1...
"Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> Here is an interesting challenge, that may not be so obvious to some of
> you.
>
> You were told to co
ate: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 3:31 AM
Subject: Re: A challenge
>I haven't got a clue! I think A is on the same subnet as B&C but maybe A
>hasn't been set up for tcp/ip. Could it be that it's running a different
>protocol?
>
>--
>Michael S Garcia
>CCN
Host A has subnet mask of 255.255.255.252?
--- Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Here is an interesting challenge, that may not be so
> obvious to some of
> you.
>
> You were told to configure a network as follows:
>
> 10.1.1.1/8router
> 10.1.1.2/8hostA gw 10.1.1.1
> 10.1.1.3/8h
O well, I fudged my own challenge post. What I should have posted was:
You were told to configure a network as follows:
10.1.1.1/8router
10.1.2.2/8hostA gw 10.1.1.1
10.1.3.3/8hostB gw 10.1.1.1
10.1.4.4/8hostC gw 10.1.1.1
hostA cannot ping hostB or hostC. hostB and hostC
Hey that was fun! I wasn't as stumped as I thought! The answer given was one
of my original thoughts however the framing of the question eliminated that
as an answer. Being on a different netmask would certainly produce these
results... Thanks a lot Brian...LOL
--
Michael S Garcia
CCNA - MCP - CC
; >
> > Todd
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > Brian
> > Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 8:07 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: A challenge
> >
> >
> >
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of
> > Brian
> > Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 8:07 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: A challenge
> >
> >
> >
> > Here is an interesting challenge, that may not be so
obviou
ed the results I typed. I am trying to get people to guess what
> > mistake would cause that.
> >
> > Brian
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Todd
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, ElephantChild wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I guess the netmask for host A is wrongly given as 255.255.255.0 instead of
> > 255.0.0.0
>
> No. All addresses are in the same subnet whether you make it a /8 or a
> /24.
right, see my other post, I m
22 matches
Mail list logo
