Any difference between secondary address and subinterface for a port?

2000-08-14 Thread Frank Jordan
Under what circumstance should we choose one of them but not the other? Thanks in advance. ___ UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com Report misconduct and Nondis

Re: Any difference between secondary address and subinterface for a port?

2000-08-14 Thread Briggs
um...I think cisco stated that secondary addresses will not be supported in some future IOS releases, so.. that's a decent reason not to use them. "Frank Jordan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 8n8um0$5cn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8n8um0$5cn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Under what circumstance

Re: Any difference between secondary address and subinterface for a port?

2000-08-14 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
Secondary addressing and subinterfacing serve different purposes. In my less than humble opinion, the major applications for secondary addresses are workarounds for problems caused by the dinosaur of classful addressing. These are discussed in detail in Chapter 5 of my _Designing Addressing Ar

Re: Any difference between secondary address and subinterface for a port?

2000-08-14 Thread William V. Wollman
I do not think Cisco would discontinue the use of secondary IP addresses. There are so many different uses for them and it seems (at least in my experience) that every network hack out there always uses them --- not that i necessarily always like them--- but if you customers use it and need it the