RE: BCMSN: VLAN's and Subnets

2000-09-21 Thread Johns, Andrew M ETC (CNE N654)
CCNA CNA A+ -Original Message- From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 6:10 PM To: 'Daniel Boutet'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: BCMSN: VLAN's and Subnets No problem Daniel, and thanks to you and the others who rep

RE: BCMSN: VLAN's and Subnets

2000-09-21 Thread Ejay Hire
en'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: BCMSN: VLAN's and Subnets Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 12:33:06 -0400 To add a little twist to that scenario. If for instance in your server block, you place 2 NICs on ea

RE: BCMSN: VLAN's and Subnets

2000-09-21 Thread Ole Drews Jensen
/ccnp -Original Message- From: Ejay Hire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 9:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BCMSN: VLAN's and Subnets You are correct. It is POSSIBLE to do it this way as long as the two separate VL

Re: BCMSN: VLAN's and Subnets

2000-09-21 Thread Ejay Hire
-Original Message Follows From: Ole Drews Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Ole Drews Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: BCMSN: VLAN's and Subnets Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 10:47:56 -0500 I have a question abo

RE: BCMSN: VLAN's and Subnets

2000-09-20 Thread Ole Drews Jensen
-Original Message- From: Daniel Boutet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 11:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: BCMSN: VLAN's and Subnets I noticed after I sent. Sorry Ole "Ole Drews Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: BCMSN: VLAN's and Subnets

2000-09-20 Thread Daniel Boutet
~ > > > > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Boutet1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 11:22 AM > To: Ole Drews Jensen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: BCMSN: VLAN's and Subnets > > > I have one problem with thi

RE: BCMSN: VLAN's and Subnets

2000-09-20 Thread Ole Drews Jensen
/ccnp -Original Message- From: Daniel Boutet1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 11:22 AM To: Ole Drews Jensen; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: BCMSN: VLAN's and Subnets I have one problem with this scenario: Why did you put VLAN under la

RE: BCMSN: VLAN's and Subnets

2000-09-20 Thread Watson, Rick, , OUSDC
VLANs to see the "same" resources (servers)? -Original Message- From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 11:48 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: BCMSN: VLAN's and Subnets I have a question about implementing VLAN&#x

RE: BCMSN: VLAN's and Subnets

2000-09-20 Thread Daniel Boutet1
having two LANs. The switches can also be totally separate. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ole Drews Jensen Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 9:48 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: BCMSN: VLAN's and Subnets I have a

Re: BCMSN: VLAN's and Subnets

2000-09-20 Thread Dragon
Looks good to me, however if you are planning to use inter-VLan routing you might want to make sure that the protocol you select can handle VLSM. David Ng Senior Systems Engineer Integration Technologies Inc. 1201 Dove Street Suite 200 Newport Beach CA 92660 Microsoft MCSE, Cisco CCNA/CCDA,

BCMSN: VLAN's and Subnets

2000-09-20 Thread Ole Drews Jensen
I have a question about implementing VLAN's in existing LAN's. Let's say that I have one office with stacked switches connecting 100 users to a network with a couple of servers and other good stuff. Layer 2 info: Ethernet, one big broadcast domain Layer 3 info: IP, one fu