Re: BGP in Production [7:30535]

2001-12-31 Thread Jason
BORING.. ""nrf"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Aw come on, I was about to talk about the merits of EGP and BGP3. Who needs > classless addressing anyway? > > > ""Wojtek Zlobicki"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > I mean

Re: BGP in Production [7:30535]

2001-12-31 Thread nrf
Aw come on, I was about to talk about the merits of EGP and BGP3. Who needs classless addressing anyway? ""Wojtek Zlobicki"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I mean what version of IOS "OF COURSE" ... ;-)) > > Wow, had me scared there for a while :P Message

Re: BGP in Production [7:30535]

2001-12-31 Thread Peter van Oene
Totally depends on the platform/feature set you require. I expect most try and stay in the S train, though MPLS pushes you to the ST train. Usually folks talk to their cisco SE team and get a feel for which IOS is likely to be the most stable. Definately most are in the 12 range now though I

Re: BGP in Production [7:30535]

2001-12-31 Thread Wojtek Zlobicki
> I mean what version of IOS "OF COURSE" ... ;-)) Wow, had me scared there for a while :P Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30542&t=30535 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list

Re: BGP in Production [7:30535]

2001-12-31 Thread Jason
I mean what version of IOS "OF COURSE" ... ;-)) "Jason" wrote in message news:... > I just want to check with you guys running BGP in production, what versions > are you using right now ? > > Thanks... > > Jason Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30535&t=30535 -