Re: BGP metrics [7:36596]

2002-02-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timothy Ouellette)
Chuck, Wouldn't it be safer to say that if a BGP speaking router learns a prefix from a peer that doesn't have an AS-path attribute (what you referenced as being originated from) then it is IBGP because bgp won't tag it's own as-path onto a prefix until it tries to go over a ebgp connectiong.

Re: BGP metrics [7:36596]

2002-02-27 Thread Chuck
I checked RFC 1771 just to be sure. You are correct that I should not have discussed this in terms of the AS-PATH Within the BGP update message there is a field defined as path attributes One of the sub fields of path attributes is the origin . bit settings within this sub field are the

BGP metrics [7:36596]

2002-02-26 Thread Thom Castognalia
How does a router assign an iBGP AD vs. an eBGP AD? The iBGP AD is less preferred than EIGRP and the other interior RPs, is that correct? (one week until RS qual. exam) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=36596t=36596

Re: BGP metrics [7:36596]

2002-02-26 Thread Chuck
how does the router know? I would imagine the router OS checks the BGP origin. If I am AS 559 and I receive a BGP route that originates in AS 559, it is either iBGP, or I have a loop. If AS 559 is the only AS in the AS path, it follows that it is an iBGP route, and therefore is assigned an AD of