>On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, John Nemeth wrote:
>
>> On Jul 3, 3:55am, "Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote:
>> }
>> } Photonic switching, where traffic is rerouted based at the high-speed
>> } stream level rather than the packet or cell level, isn't here in
>> } production, but it is coming rapidly. Photo
>John Nemeth said,
>On Jul 6, 1:28pm, "Brian Lodwick" wrote:
>}
>} I have heard many tales of how ATM will explode soon, will be partenered
>} perfectly with DSL, and everyone will implement it, but I just haven't seen
>} it. I like the idea of improving technologies your engineering and suppo
>On Jul 3, 3:55am, "Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote:
>}
>} Photonic switching, where traffic is rerouted based at the high-speed
>} stream level rather than the packet or cell level, isn't here in
>} production, but it is coming rapidly. Photonic switching will
>} complement, not replace, routing. P
On Jul 6, 1:28pm, "Brian Lodwick" wrote:
}
} I have heard many tales of how ATM will explode soon, will be partenered
} perfectly with DSL, and everyone will implement it, but I just haven't seen
} it. I like the idea of improving technologies your engineering and support
} staff are familiar
On Jul 3, 3:55am, "Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote:
}
} Photonic switching, where traffic is rerouted based at the high-speed
} stream level rather than the packet or cell level, isn't here in
} production, but it is coming rapidly. Photonic switching will
} complement, not replace, routing. Ple
>From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: BPX going out of style?
>Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 14:26:13 -0500
>
> >John,
> >I have hea
;From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth)
>>To: "Brian Lodwick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: BPX going out of style?
>>Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 05:01:31 -0800
>>
>> From what I see, there seems to be a lot of emphasis on GigE an
PROTECTED] (John Nemeth)
>To: "Brian Lodwick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: BPX going out of style?
>Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 05:01:31 -0800
>
> From what I see, there seems to be a lot of emphasis on GigE and
>the very rapidly upcoming
> From what I see, there seems to be a lot of emphasis on GigE and
>the very rapidly upcoming 10GigE combined with QOS now adays. ATM
>really doesn't seem to work that well with data (TCP/IP) and has a very
>high overhead. Ethernet is getting fast enough that when combined with
>QOS it can
From what I see, there seems to be a lot of emphasis on GigE and
the very rapidly upcoming 10GigE combined with QOS now adays. ATM
really doesn't seem to work that well with data (TCP/IP) and has a very
high overhead. Ethernet is getting fast enough that when combined with
QOS it can easily
Group,
Wanted to poll some opinions. Yesterday I read an article which had an
interview with Sam Halabi. In his interview he noted his reason for leaving
Cisco was he thought it was a bad idea to get rid of their high end ATM
switches. (I assume he is referring to the BPX's when he say's thei
11 matches
Mail list logo
