Re: CCNP Re-certification [7:69556]

2003-05-27 Thread Kevin Wigle
. I'll be trying it again soon. CCNP expires in June. Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: "Kevin Wigle" To: Sent: Monday, May 26, 2003 10:36 PM Subject: CCNP Re-certification [7:69556] > I failed my first attempt 2 weeks ago. Back then the exam was 2 hours - >

Re: CCNP Re-certification [7:69556]

2003-05-27 Thread Charlie Wehner
I've noticed that the simulation questions perform terrible and sometimes lock up when run on low-end computers. They need to raise the minimum PC requirements for Prometric test centers in my opinion. Don't be afraid to email Cisco about any problems with the exam. Message Posted at: http://ww

RE: CCNP Re-certification [7:69556]

2003-05-28 Thread Jurkouich, Brett, CNTR, DCAA
time lucky. I'll be trying it again soon. CCNP expires in June. Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: "Kevin Wigle" To: Sent: Monday, May 26, 2003 10:36 PM Subject: CCNP Re-certification [7:69556] > I failed my first attempt 2 weeks ago. Back then the exam was 2 ho

RE: CCNP Re-certification [7:69556]

2003-05-30 Thread jeff sicuranza
Well I passed the exam, ccnp recert today, it was close, man what a pain. I only studied a week and a half and mostly labbed my work. Considering I have not touched a cisco router or done much cisco work since my first ccie lab attempt last september(I was burnt out of cisco and sick of it) I guess

RE: CCNP Re-certification [7:69556]

2003-05-31 Thread jeff sicuranza
No, from what I have heard from an older thread, here or over at cisco's forum is that you can re-take any ccnp/dp re-cert exam as many times as you need to pass before your re-cert date expires. After that you have to start all over again from ccna. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/f

Re: CCNP Re-certification [7:69556]

2003-05-31 Thread Kevin Wigle
only that you must weight 72 hours between attempts. Prometric doesn't count hours so 3 calendar days Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: "jeff sicuranza" To: Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 9:54 AM Subject: RE: CCNP Re-certification [7:69556] > No, from what I

RE: CCNP Re-certification [7:69556]

2003-05-31 Thread jeff sicuranza
Well fellas I passed the CCDP recert today. Man what a messed up test. The exam objectives on CCO(for all tests) are not what are on this exam. This exam is basically version 1 Routing, Switching, Remote access and CID version 1 from 3-4 years ago. I mean I did have some MLS but I had x25, smds, at

Re: CCNP Re-certification [7:69556]

2003-05-31 Thread Kevin Wigle
only that you must weight 72 hours between attempts. Prometric doesn't count hours so 3 calendar days Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: "jeff sicuranza" To: Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 9:54 AM Subject: RE: CCNP Re-certification [7:69556] > No, from what I

RE: CCNP Re-certification [7:69556]

2003-05-31 Thread jeff sicuranza
No, from what I have heard from an older thread, here or over at cisco's forum is that you can re-take any ccnp/dp re-cert exam as many times as you need to pass before your re-cert date expires. After that you have to start all over again from ccna. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com

Re: CCNP Re-certification [7:69556]

2003-05-31 Thread Kevin Wigle
only that you must weight 72 hours between attempts. Prometric doesn't count hours so 3 calendar days Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: "jeff sicuranza" To: Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 9:54 AM Subject: RE: CCNP Re-certification [7:69556] > No, from what I

RE: CCNP Re-certification [7:69556]

2003-05-31 Thread jeff sicuranza
Well fellas I passed the CCDP recert today. Man what a messed up test. The exam objectives on CCO(for all tests) are not what are on this exam. This exam is basically version 1 Routing, Switching, Remote access and CID version 1 from 3-4 years ago. I mean I did have some MLS but I had x25, smds, at

Re: CCNP Re-certification [7:69556]

2003-06-01 Thread jeff sicuranza
Kevin Wigle wrote: > > only that you must weight 72 hours between attempts. Prometric > doesn't > count hours so 3 calendar days > > Kevin Wigle > > - Original Message - > From: "jeff sicuranza" > To: > Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 9:54