Re: CCxx Copyright Infringement [7:31391]

2002-01-10 Thread David Weiss
hmmm, sure does not get paid a lot for being such a great consultant, and to make it relate to the list, he does not have a CCNA. >>> "Steven A. Ridder" 01/09/02 12:45PM >>> Speaking of fools: http://petemoss.com/spamflames/ShifmanIsAMoronSpammer.html This spammer sent ot spam, so someone rep

RE: CCxx Copyright Infringement [7:31391]

2002-01-09 Thread Kaminski, Shawn G
x27;m sorry to waste bandwidth on this but I just needed to vented earlier. Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Brian Zeitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 5:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CCxx Copyright Infringement [7:31391] Just curious, is that wh

RE: CCxx Copyright Infringement [7:31391]

2002-01-09 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
t;-Original Message- >From: Kaminski, Shawn G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 2:16 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: CCxx Copyright Infringement [7:31391] > > >I hate to waste bandwidth on stuff like this, but this really pisses me off.

RE: CCxx Copyright Infringement [7:31391]

2002-01-09 Thread Kaminski, Shawn G
. -Original Message- From: Kaminski, Shawn G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 2:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCxx Copyright Infringement [7:31391] I hate to waste bandwidth on stuff like this, but this really pisses me off. I want you to take a look at

RE: CCxx Copyright Infringement [7:31391]

2002-01-09 Thread Brian Zeitz
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 2:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CCxx Copyright Infringement [7:31391] I hate to waste bandwidth on stuff like this, but this really pisses me off. I want you to take a look at CCxx Production's website (www.ccxxproductions.com

Re: CCxx Copyright Infringement [7:31391]

2002-01-09 Thread Steven A. Ridder
Speaking of fools: http://petemoss.com/spamflames/ShifmanIsAMoronSpammer.html This spammer sent ot spam, so someone reported the incident to the ISP. Not only did the spammer cuss out the reporter, he threatned to sue him! It's a halarious link. -- RFC 1149 Compliant. FAQ, list archives, an

Re: CCxx Copyright Infringement [7:31391]

2002-01-09 Thread Gaz
It's not exactly the same. Suresh seems to have spent some time translating it in to bad English. I weren't learnt like that when I was a children. Gaz ""Kaminski, Shawn G"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I hate to waste bandwidth on stuff like this, but this re

RE: CCxx Copyright Infringement [7:31391]

2002-01-09 Thread Mike Sweeney
Stealing is a strong accusation but it is a reality of the *lift and paste* mindset of some folks. You can do things to help slow it down and then do other items to protect your copywrite.. embedded copywrites in images (not visible normally) watermark images(visible) compress html files (stops

CCxx Copyright Infringement [7:31391]

2002-01-09 Thread Kaminski, Shawn G
I hate to waste bandwidth on stuff like this, but this really pisses me off. I want you to take a look at CCxx Production's website (www.ccxxproductions.com ) and then take a look at this website (http://sureshhomepage.com/ccnp/more_ccnp.html ). It's obvious that this Suresh has stolen CCxx's si