Re: Catalyst vs Juniper

2001-03-20 Thread Peter Van Oene
ot;Peter Van Oene" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Frankie" [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Catalyst vs Juniper Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 17:57:58 -0500 What is the desired role for the device? Its hard to compare a pure IP router with an enterprise L2/L3 box. Not

Re: Catalyst vs Juniper

2001-03-19 Thread Frank cisco
TECTED] To: "Frankie" [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Catalyst vs Juniper Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 17:57:58 -0500 What is the desired role for the device? Its hard to compare a pure IP router with an enterprise L2/L3 box. Not that this is the first time I've heard the questio

Catalyst vs Juniper

2001-03-13 Thread Frankie
Hello, Anyone do a comparative analysis between Cisco's Catalyst 6500 to, say, Juniper's M10? _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Catalyst vs Juniper

2001-03-13 Thread Peter Van Oene
What is the desired role for the device? Its hard to compare a pure IP router with an enterprise L2/L3 box. Not that this is the first time I've heard the question :) Pete *** REPLY SEPARATOR *** On 3/13/2001 at 12:26 PM Frankie wrote: Hello, Anyone do a comparative

Re: Catalyst vs Juniper

2001-03-13 Thread Vitaliy Pindyura
It's not about Catalyst, this is Internet Core Router Test, published a week ago. Guess who is winner? http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?site=testingdoc_id=4009 Vitaliy Pindyura, CCNP, CCDA. ""Frankie"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message 018e01c0ac0c$a3935260$[EMAIL