ot;Peter Van Oene" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Frankie" [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Catalyst vs Juniper
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 17:57:58 -0500
What is the desired role for the device? Its hard to compare a pure IP
router with an enterprise L2/L3 box. Not
TECTED]
To: "Frankie" [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Catalyst vs Juniper
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 17:57:58 -0500
What is the desired role for the device? Its hard to compare a pure IP
router with an enterprise L2/L3 box. Not that this is the first time I've
heard the questio
Hello,
Anyone do a comparative analysis between Cisco's Catalyst 6500 to, say,
Juniper's M10?
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is the desired role for the device? Its hard to compare a pure IP router with an
enterprise L2/L3 box. Not that this is the first time I've heard the question :)
Pete
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 3/13/2001 at 12:26 PM Frankie wrote:
Hello,
Anyone do a comparative
It's not about Catalyst, this is Internet Core Router Test, published a week
ago. Guess who is winner?
http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?site=testingdoc_id=4009
Vitaliy Pindyura, CCNP, CCDA.
""Frankie"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
018e01c0ac0c$a3935260$[EMAIL
5 matches
Mail list logo