Re: Cisco/3Com compatibility

2001-02-28 Thread Dave W.
quot;Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Shaun Wakelen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: "Cisco GS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Cisco/3Com compatibility Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 00:02:50 -0200 I agree- lock that 3500 in the same mode as the 3Com. Phil - Original

Re: Cisco/3Com compatibility

2001-02-27 Thread Circusnuts
I agree- lock that 3500 in the same mode as the 3Com. Phil - Original Message - From: "Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Shaun Wakelen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Cisco GS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 2:31 AM Subject:

Re: Cisco/3Com compatibility

2001-02-27 Thread Brian
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Shaun Wakelen wrote: > Hi all > > Does anybody have any experience of compatibility issues between a Cisco > switch and a 3Com switch? We have a 3548 connected to a 3Com SuperStack II > Desktop Switch. The link is manually set up as 100MB full duplex, and a show > interface o

Cisco/3Com compatibility

2001-02-27 Thread Shaun Wakelen
Hi all Does anybody have any experience of compatibility issues between a Cisco switch and a 3Com switch? We have a 3548 connected to a 3Com SuperStack II Desktop Switch. The link is manually set up as 100MB full duplex, and a show interface on the 3548 shows a large number of CRC errors, but no