RE: Cisco Aironet 340

2001-04-02 Thread MattM
cell tests, but the FCC informed us that indeed the cell carrier is capable of interfering with the bridge since our frequency is unlicensed. Matthew -Original Message- From: Rodgers Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 5:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Ci

Re: Cisco Aironet 340

2001-03-29 Thread Rodgers Moore
aptops and > it works pretty well. > > Matthew > > -Original Message- > From: Adekola, Dennis D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 8:55 AM > To: cisco > Subject: Cisco Aironet 340 > > Hi Guys, > > I just heard that we shall be

RE: Cisco Aironet 340

2001-03-27 Thread Buri, Heather H
Suite 500 Houston, TX 77056 -Original Message- From: Adekola, Dennis D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 10:55 AM To: cisco Subject: Cisco Aironet 340 Hi Guys, I just heard that we shall be dealing in Cisco Aironet 340 roaming Has anyone

RE: Cisco Aironet 340

2001-03-27 Thread MattM
and it works pretty well. Matthew -Original Message- From: Adekola, Dennis D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 8:55 AM To: cisco Subject: Cisco Aironet 340 Hi Guys, I just heard that we shall be dealing in Cisco Aironet 340 roaming Has anyone had experience with this ?

Cisco Aironet 340

2001-03-27 Thread Adekola, Dennis D
Hi Guys, I just heard that we shall be dealing in Cisco Aironet 340 roaming Has anyone had experience with this ? I have had a look on the cisco website and i can see it has something to do with wireless laptops/PC's just wondered if anyone out there could give me a brief summary o