Tuesday, October 15, 2002 3:30 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Cisco ExecNet [7:55573]
>
>>The Long and Winding Road wrote:
>>>
>>> ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
&g
ubject: Re: Cisco ExecNet [7:55573]
>The Long and Winding Road wrote:
>>
>> ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> > I always thought that the PSTN was based off of that fact
>> that
>The Long and Winding Road wrote:
>>
>> ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> > I always thought that the PSTN was based off of that fact
>> that not all
>> > phones would be calling at once, and if they did, then some
>> would get
>> > th
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> One more quick OT comment. The TV will become a computer and this will be
a
> good thing. It's ridiculous that so many people spend hours in front of an
> absoultely dumb device that is only one-way and has
One more quick OT comment. The TV will become a computer and this will be a
good thing. It's ridiculous that so many people spend hours in front of an
absoultely dumb device that is only one-way and has a horrid user interface
(a remote control!) That will change and it will be pretty exciting. Yo
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
>
> ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I always thought that the PSTN was based off of that fact
> that not all
> > phones would be calling at once, and if they did, then some
> would get
> > through while oth
I think wireless and converged data over high speed links wil co-exist, not
compete for same space n market. I can't see high-speed wireless out in the
"WAN" of a cellular network anywhere down the road. Without that speed over
wireless, we are stuck with being able to DL e-mails and web-pages a
""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I always thought that the PSTN was based off of that fact that not all
> phones would be calling at once, and if they did, then some would get
> through while others wouldn't.
CL: yes. true. however, decades ago
I remeber what that emergency network is: GETS.
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I always thought that the PSTN was based off of that fact that not all
> phones would be calling at once, and if they did, then some wo
I always thought that the PSTN was based off of that fact that not all
phones would be calling at once, and if they did, then some would get
through while others wouldn't. Then to ensure that important calls got
through during these periods, there was the priority network that gov't
officials hav
""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I understand the technology and stand by whoever said what IP
telephony/VoIP
> isn't a bandwidth hungry app. It isn't. G.729, which can use as little
as
> 8k with proper compresion, has nearly the same MOS scor
I understand the technology and stand by whoever said what IP telephony/VoIP
isn't a bandwidth hungry app. It isn't. G.729, which can use as little as
8k with proper compresion, has nearly the same MOS score as G.711, which is
toll quality. Even though it's not officially "toll quality" I consi
Hello Mark.
I'd like to pass EVODD.
Can you advise me some book for prepare EVODD
and you opinion about this exam?
WBR,
Aleksey Alekseev
> > Mark Snow
> > CCNP, CCDP, CQS - CIPT Design, CIPT Support
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55578&t=55573
-
Amen Brotha
But as long were not broke and get to play (i mean work) with bleeding edge
tech, and companies can afford this stuff,
Then Drive on Cisco, Drive on!
Mark Snow
CCNP, CCDP, CQS - CIPT Design, CIPT Support
-Original Message-
From: Joe A
To: 'Nathan Chessin'; 'Albert Lu'; [EM
14 matches
Mail list logo
