RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468]

2001-09-20 Thread Jeff Smith
over a year. >From: "Andras Bellak" >Reply-To: "Andras Bellak" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] >Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:15:56 -0400 > >One thing to be aware of - the VPN client doesn't (at least didn't last

RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468]

2001-09-20 Thread Spencer Plantier
ber 20, 2001 10:45 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] > > > The VPN client FULLY supports Windows 2000 as well > as Windows ME, 98, NT, > and 95. The unified client is tons better than the > old client that Cisco had > out. The new

RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468]

2001-09-20 Thread Jeff Chambers
ECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim O'Brien Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] The VPN client FULLY supports Windows 2000 as well as Windows ME, 98, NT, and 95. The unified client is tons better than the old client that Cisco had ou

Re: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468]

2001-09-20 Thread Frank Jordan
Could you tell me where should i put my concentrator in my network? best regards, frank "Bob Johnson" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi, > > I'm looking for comments about various Cisco VPN options allowing access > from a home workstation.. > As far as I know

RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468]

2001-09-20 Thread Neil Borne
I am curoius to see what happens when CISCO comes out with the next Unified client later on P. Neil Borne, CCDA,CCNP and C-voice Systems Integrator III >From: "Andras Bellak" >Reply-To: "Andras Bellak" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Cisco VPN So

Re: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468]

2001-09-20 Thread Tim O'Brien
up code. The termination to IOS is slated for later this year, I hear. Tim - Original Message - From: "Andras Bellak" To: Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 10:15 AM Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] One thing to be aware of - the VPN client doesn't (at least d

RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468]

2001-09-20 Thread Hyde, Lori
0, 2001 10:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] One thing to be aware of - the VPN client doesn't (at least didn't last time I looked) support Windows 2000. It also has (once again, possibly should be "had") big issues with some ISPs, especial

RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468]

2001-09-20 Thread Andras Bellak
, it's a real p.i.t.a. Andras -Original Message- From: Neil Borne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 6:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] The better, but more costly choice is the concentrator, you have a lot less issues to

RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468]

2001-09-20 Thread Neil Borne
EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] >Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 08:42:52 -0400 > >I've used both the IOS and the concentrator solutions. I have found the >concentrator solution to be more expensive, but absolutely rock solid. The >IOS solution is less expen

RE: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468]

2001-09-20 Thread Hyde, Lori
e the bucks, go with the concentrator. By far the better choice from a maintenance and reliablity aspect. Lori -Original Message- From: Bob Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 6:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468] Hi, I'

Cisco VPN Solutions [7:20468]

2001-09-19 Thread Bob Johnson
Hi, I'm looking for comments about various Cisco VPN options allowing access from a home workstation.. As far as I know my options are: 1) Cisco PIX accessed by VPN Client 1.1 2) Cisco 3000 (or 5000) Concentrator accessed by VPN client 3.1 3) Cisco IPsec IOS access by VPN Client 1.1 It would se