Re: Cryptography and frame-relay [7:46621]

ity processes > are non-existant, you are wasting your time in securing the transport > between locations. Pick off the low hanging fruit first. > > TTFN, > Bill > > > -Original Message- > From: Paulo Roque [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, June 14, 20

RE: Cryptography and frame-relay [7:46621]

curing the transport between locations. Pick off the low hanging fruit first. TTFN, Bill -Original Message- From: Paulo Roque [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 11:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cryptography and frame-relay [7:46621] Hi All, Is necessary to e

RE: Cryptography and frame-relay [7:46621]

rried about it.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Paulo Roque Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 3:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cryptography and frame-relay [7:46621] Hi All, Is necessary to encrypt the comunication that goes over frame-

Re: Cryptography and frame-relay [7:46621]

those interested in one vendor's opinion regarding security of anythig over frame relay or other private lines might be interested in this: http://www.milgo.com/rdg/products/ds/ds1462/DS1462.htm formerly Racal-Milgo, Milgo Solutions has been selling product like this for several years now. HTH

Re: Cryptography and frame-relay [7:46621]

Paulo Roque wrote: > > Hi All, > > Is necessary to encrypt the comunication that goes over frame-relay links or > the frame-relay virtual circuits (PVC/SVC) mechanisms are secure enough to > protect my data? > I think that this is pretty subjective. What is the value of the data that is tr

Cryptography and frame-relay [7:46621]

Hi All, Is necessary to encrypt the comunication that goes over frame-relay links or the frame-relay virtual circuits (PVC/SVC) mechanisms are secure enough to protect my data? Thanks -- Eng. Paulo Roque Network Engineer C