Difference between "encrypting" and "hashing" (was: Re: LOL)

2001-02-24 Thread Bradley J. Wilson
Whoops...looks like I've started a new thread here. ;-) Hashing: What's green and red and goes a hundred miles an hour? You guessed it, a frog in a blender. When you "hash" a password, that's essentially what you're doing - putting it in a blender and making something completely different that

Re: Difference between "encrypting" and "hashing" (was: Re: LOL)

2001-02-24 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
>Whoops...looks like I've started a new thread here. ;-) > >Hashing: > >What's green and red and goes a hundred miles an hour? You guessed it, a >frog in a blender. When you "hash" a password, that's essentially what >you're doing - putting it in a blender and making something completely >differ

Re: Difference between "encrypting" and "hashing" (was: Re: LOL)

2001-02-24 Thread Rodgers Moore
I'd just wanted to tag-on to the hash can't be undone statement. It's not always apparent why a hash can't be undone. I know a few people that would say the doctor on Star Trek would have no problem putting the frog back together. To them it's still in the realm of possible, no matter how hard

Re: Difference between "encrypting" and "hashing" (was: Re: LOL)

2001-02-24 Thread pierreg
This is very interesting. Would you please talk more on the section below. There are infinite numbers between 1 and 2 and 2 and 3. But how does that guarantee uniqueness of passwords? "So how does a hash guarantee that many A values don't result in the same B result? I'll let you figure that

Re: Difference between "encrypting" and "hashing" (was: Re: LOL)

2001-02-24 Thread Brian
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, Bradley J. Wilson wrote: > Whoops...looks like I've started a new thread here. ;-) > > Hashing: > > What's green and red and goes a hundred miles an hour? You guessed it, a > frog in a blender. When you "hash" a password, that's essentially what > you're doing - putting it