Re: EIGRP Adjacenies are Unidirectional. Why? [7:59186]

2002-12-13 Thread Marty Adkins
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote: > > As EIGRP only looks at incoming hello packets (EIGRP type 5 packets) to keep > a peer neighbor relationship up on a particular side of a routed link., this > can be a prime issue for "black hole" routing issues. > > OSPF adjacencies are bi-directional. Makes more se

RE: EIGRP Adjacenies are Unidirectional. Why? [7:59186]

2002-12-13 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 7:40 PM + 12/13/02, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> As EIGRP only looks at incoming hello packets (EIGRP type 5 >> packets) to keep >> a peer neighbor relationship up on a particular side of a >> routed link., this >> can be a prime issue for "black hole" ro

RE: EIGRP Adjacenies are Unidirectional. Why? [7:59186]

2002-12-13 Thread Daniel Cotts
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 12:29 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: EIGRP Adjacenies are Unidirectional. Why? [7:59186] > > > As EIGRP only looks at incoming hello packets (EIGRP type 5 > packets) to keep > a peer neighbor relationship u

RE: EIGRP Adjacenies are Unidirectional. Why? [7:59186]

2002-12-13 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > As EIGRP only looks at incoming hello packets (EIGRP type 5 > packets) to keep > a peer neighbor relationship up on a particular side of a > routed link., this > can be a prime issue for "black hole" routing issues. > > OSPF adjacencies are bi-directional. Makes more

EIGRP Adjacenies are Unidirectional. Why? [7:59186]

2002-12-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As EIGRP only looks at incoming hello packets (EIGRP type 5 packets) to keep a peer neighbor relationship up on a particular side of a routed link., this can be a prime issue for "black hole" routing issues. OSPF adjacencies are bi-directional. Makes more sense. Why was EIGRP designed this way?