"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
>
> As EIGRP only looks at incoming hello packets (EIGRP type 5 packets) to
keep
> a peer neighbor relationship up on a particular side of a routed link.,
this
> can be a prime issue for "black hole" routing issues.
>
> OSPF adjacencies are bi-directional. Makes more se
At 7:40 PM + 12/13/02, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> As EIGRP only looks at incoming hello packets (EIGRP type 5
>> packets) to keep
>> a peer neighbor relationship up on a particular side of a
>> routed link., this
>> can be a prime issue for "black hole" ro
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 12:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: EIGRP Adjacenies are Unidirectional. Why? [7:59186]
>
>
> As EIGRP only looks at incoming hello packets (EIGRP type 5
> packets) to keep
> a peer neighbor relationship u
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> As EIGRP only looks at incoming hello packets (EIGRP type 5
> packets) to keep
> a peer neighbor relationship up on a particular side of a
> routed link., this
> can be a prime issue for "black hole" routing issues.
>
> OSPF adjacencies are bi-directional. Makes more
As EIGRP only looks at incoming hello packets (EIGRP type 5 packets) to keep
a peer neighbor relationship up on a particular side of a routed link., this
can be a prime issue for "black hole" routing issues.
OSPF adjacencies are bi-directional. Makes more sense.
Why was EIGRP designed this way?
5 matches
Mail list logo