Re: EIGRP Question [7:36770]

2002-03-06 Thread Hunt Lee
ummary range, but as this is not always the case, they include the > route to Null0 to protect valuable resources on the router from being > consumed routing packets that have no destination. > > Hope this helps. > > Kelly Cobean, CCNP, CCSA, ACSA, MCSE, MCP+I > > > -Orig

FW: EIGRP Question [7:36770]

2002-02-28 Thread Kelly Cobean
sources on the router from being consumed routing packets that have no destination. Hope this helps. Kelly Cobean, CCNP, CCSA, ACSA, MCSE, MCP+I -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hunt Lee Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 12:20 AM To: [EMAIL PR

RE: EIGRP Question [7:36770]

2002-02-28 Thread Ladrach, Daniel E.
, February 28, 2002 12:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: EIGRP Question [7:36770] Hi all, I have an EIGRP question. It would be greatly appreciated if someone can shed some light on this. I found the following Routing Table from TCP / IP Vol1 by Jeff Doyle. But I don't understand why a su

Re: EIGRP Question [7:36770]

2002-02-28 Thread Theo
Hi, As I see it: A router summarizing, let's say a C class, might have in its routing table several entries for subnets of that C class. This router receives a default route from one of its neighbors. Let's assume there isn't the summary pointing to Null0: a packet coming into this router sent t

EIGRP Question [7:36770]

2002-02-27 Thread Hunt Lee
Hi all, I have an EIGRP question. It would be greatly appreciated if someone can shed some light on this. I found the following Routing Table from TCP / IP Vol1 by Jeff Doyle. But I don't understand why a summary route would be pointing to Null0? Jeff explains it as "this route helps to prev