EIGRP feas dist and successor [7:41957]

2002-04-19 Thread Sean Wolfe
EIGRP question: According to Cisco's website: Feasible distance is the best metric along a path to a destination network, including the metric to the neighbor advertising that path. A feasible successor is a path whose reported distance is less than the feasible distance. But wouldn't a route

Re: EIGRP feas dist and successor [7:41957]

2002-04-19 Thread John Neiberger
The key words here are Feasible Distance and Advertised Distance, or in this case, reported distance. The FD is the metric for the current path. If we have two neighbors who are reporting that they can reach that network, both will be advertising what *their* FD is, which from our perspective

Re: EIGRP feas dist and successor [7:41957]

2002-04-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timothy Ouellette)
Excellent description John. Reinforced my understanding of FD and AD Tim On 19 Apr 2002 12:07:22 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Neiberger) wrote: The key words here are Feasible Distance and Advertised Distance, or in this case, reported distance. The FD is the metric for the current path.

Re: EIGRP feas dist and successor [7:41957]

2002-04-19 Thread Tom Lisa
Even medicated, your answers are clearer than many. Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI Community College of Southern Nevada Cisco ATC/Regional Networking Academy John Neiberger wrote: The key words here are Feasible Distance and Advertised Distance, or in this case, reported distance. The FD is the

Variance, was Re: EIGRP feas dist and successor [7:41957]

2002-04-19 Thread John Neiberger
An interesting addendum is that this behavior is important to consider when attempting to use the variance command to influence path selection. I was configuring a variance scenario once and it wasn't working despite all my efforts. It wasn't working because I didn't understand this issue well

Re: EIGRP feas dist and successor [7:41957]

2002-04-19 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
(referring to John Neiberger) Even medicated, your answers are clearer than many. Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI Community College of Southern Nevada Cisco ATC/Regional Networking Academy Tom, I agree with your assessment of John's response, but I have to share a story. kc Claffy (her spelling) is one

RE: EIGRP feas dist and successor [7:41957]

2002-04-19 Thread Kage Roc
Great example, however let me make sure that we all aware of the terminologies, and correct me if I am wrong: Feasible Successor's are next-hop routers that advertise a routes towarads a given destination Successor\s are the choosen next-hop router\s towards a given destination Feasible

Re: EIGRP feas dist and successor [7:41957]

2002-04-19 Thread Tom Lisa
The moral of the story: Get better drugs and you don't need external displays! :) Oops, excuse me, I'm having flashbacks to the 60's. The name O'Leary keep popping into my head for some reason. Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI Community College of Southern Nevada Cisco ATC/Regional Networking Academy