Ethernet vs. Fast Ethernet [7:515]

2001-04-13 Thread Sammi
Ok, very basic question, I apologize. I know 10/100 is ethernet/fast ethernet, but what is the compatibility issues? If you have a 10/100 device configured for ethernet (say a 2900xl switch) will it only go at 100 if specifically configured for Fast Ethernet? I can't find any literature that clea

RE: Ethernet vs. Fast Ethernet [7:515]

2001-04-13 Thread West, Karl
-Original Message- From: Sammi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 5:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Ethernet vs. Fast Ethernet [7:515] Ok, very basic question, I apologize. I know 10/100 is ethernet/fast ethernet, but what is the compatibility issues? If you have a

RE: Ethernet vs. Fast Ethernet [7:515]

2001-04-13 Thread Irwin Lazar
t has been since I've actually touched a real network. :-) ) Irwin -Original Message- From: Sammi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 5:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Ethernet vs. Fast Ethernet [7:515] Ok, very basic question, I apologize. I know 10/100 i

RE: Ethernet vs. Fast Ethernet [7:515]

2001-04-13 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
s.. Priscilla >Irwin > >-Original Message- >From: Sammi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 5:42 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Ethernet vs. Fast Ethernet [7:515] > > >Ok, very basic question, I apologize. >I know 10/100 is ether

RE: Ethernet vs. Fast Ethernet [7:515]

2001-04-13 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
>>-Original Message- >>From: Sammi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 5:42 PM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Ethernet vs. Fast Ethernet [7:515] >> >> >>Ok, very basic question, I apologize. >>I know 10/100 is ethern

Re: Ethernet vs. Fast Ethernet [7:515]

2001-04-13 Thread Sammi
On 13 Apr 2001 18:45:28 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Priscilla Oppenheimer") wrote: >At 06:12 PM 4/13/01, Irwin Lazar wrote: > >>I know a few years ago several interface cards, especially those from Intel, >>had a heck of a time auto negotiating with Cisco Catalyst 5xxx's, but I'd >>imagine these p

Re: Ethernet vs. Fast Ethernet [7:515]

2001-04-13 Thread Circusnuts
tion. Cheers Phil - Original Message - From: Sammi To: Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2001 12:18 AM Subject: Re: Ethernet vs. Fast Ethernet [7:515] > On 13 Apr 2001 18:45:28 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Priscilla > Oppenheimer") wrote: > > >At 06:12 PM 4/13/01, Irwin

Re: Ethernet vs. Fast Ethernet [7:515]

2001-04-13 Thread Sammi
On 14 Apr 2001 00:41:57 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Circusnuts") wrote: >Lock it down on both side if necessary (speed 100, duplex full, etc., etc.). >Never let the switch or router IOS defaults make the decision for you (I bet >Chuck could tell you this, having just taken the CCIE lab). Autonego

Re: Ethernet vs. Fast Ethernet [7:515]

2001-04-14 Thread Dominick Marino
The switch port shoud be matched to the host nic. It does not matter if port one is 10 and port two is 100 and port 3 is 10 and port 4 is 100. etc etc etc. Dom Marino ""Sammi"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > On 14 Apr 2001 00:41:57 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Cir

Re: Ethernet vs. Fast Ethernet [7:515]

2001-04-15 Thread Marty Adkins
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: > > At 06:12 PM 4/13/01, Irwin Lazar wrote: > > >I know a few years ago several interface cards, especially those from Intel, > >had a heck of a time auto negotiating with Cisco Catalyst 5xxx's, but I'd > >imagine these problems are resolved by now. (It shows you ho