RE: FECN/BECN below a CIR [7:18444]

2001-09-05 Thread R B
> > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 10:55 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: FECN/BECN below a CIR [7:18444] > > > Don't forget as well that the time over which the > C

RE: FECN/BECN below a CIR [7:18444]

2001-09-05 Thread Eric Hoffman
AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FECN/BECN below a CIR [7:18444] Don't forget as well that the time over which the CIR usage is calculated (I've forgotten the formal term and don't feel like searching for it right now) is generally of the order of a second (at least in this part

Re: FECN/BECN below a CIR [7:18444]

2001-09-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 05/09/2001 09:48 am - "Karen E Young" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FECN/

RE: FECN/BECN below a CIR [7:18444]

2001-09-04 Thread Paul Jin
Hi, All a fecn/becn is a threshold that the provider sets at a certain limit to trigger these messages when they have a certain amount of traffic on the network. Different providers set these threshold at different levels. The fecn/becn does not mean anything will be dropped, only the DE packet

Re: FECN/BECN below a CIR [7:18444]

2001-09-04 Thread Karen E Young
If you're getting FECN/BECN traffic then its experiencing congestion. Congestion on the FR network prior to CIR being met is indeed a good sign of oversubscription. If its only occasional then it may simply have been a spike on the switch. However, if you're getting it fairly regularly, then you n

FECN/BECN below a CIR [7:18444]

2001-09-04 Thread Paul Borghese
Does anyone know if a Frame Relay provider will send FECN/BECN messages even if the CIR is not oversubscribed? Is looking at the FECN/BECN traffic a good determination of CIR oversubscription? Paul Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=18444&t=18444 ---