FW: Access list problem [7:9939]

2001-07-02 Thread William Harrison
John, Access list looks good, but do not forget https (442) and check your ip statements (not enough info.) HIH Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Brandis Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 3:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Access

Re: FW: Access list problem [7:9939]

2001-07-02 Thread Claude-Vincent
William, HTTPS port number is 443. Claude-Vincent Perez CCIE# 7419, CCDP, CCNP --- William Harrison wrote: John, Access list looks good, but do not forget https (442) and check your ip statements (not enough info.) HIH Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

FW: access-list debugs

2001-01-19 Thread Chuck Larrieu
Interesting. If I have a named access-list, it would appear I cannot do a debug Debug ip packet ? (1-199) access-list (1300-2699) access list extended range detail (cr) Chuck http://www.1112.net/lastpage.html _ FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

Re: FW: access list on bridging

2001-01-14 Thread Tony van Ree
Hi, There is a bridging MAC access list range available on Access-list 700 - 799. Using "access-list ?" will show this and probably guide you through the configs. Teunis Hobart, Tasmania Australia On Friday, January 12, 2001 at 03:22:10 PM, Murat Kirmaci wrote: Hello Everybody, I

FW: Access list

2000-08-13 Thread Hixon Sgt James R Jr
you need the keyword established- but also don't forget to permit the necessary traffic through the interface. Don't need the deny any any- it is implicit anyway -Original Message- From: Jianfeng Wang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 11, 2000 9:59 AM To: [EMAIL