nd broken code? definitely. Consistency for consistency's
sake? Well...ummm...errr...ahhhjust document it really well and upgrade
if/when you find the need.
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Larrieu"
To: "EA Louie" ;
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 5:38 PM
Subj
essage-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> EA Louie
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 2:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: FW: Why Cisco and not ...!!! [7:19933]
>
>
> > ya know, I am a fan of if it ain't broke, d
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> EA Louie
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 2:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: FW: Why Cisco and not ...!!! [7:19933]
>
>
> > ya know, I am a fan of if it ain't broke, don't fix it,
rade
fixes an identifiable problem. These days, the latest IOS is not necessarily
the best IOS.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
EA Louie
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 2:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: Why Cis
> ya know, I am a fan of if it ain't broke, don't fix it, but dudeDo you
Me too. and if I never have to mess with the routers because they're doing
their job, then why upgrade or futz with them, especially a core router? I
love to tinker just like everyone else, but the great thing about a
ya know, I am a fan of if it ain't broke, don't fix it, but dudeDo you
never want the fixes and features of newer code? Just curious... Especialy
with Cisco NAT in it's infant stages...
-Patrick
>>> "David Toalson" 09/14/01 11:52AM >>>
I work at a subsidiary of a large healthcare company.
I work at a subsidiary of a large healthcare company. My office is 100%
Cisco for Routers and Switches. We have a total of 30 routers and 8
switches. I work with 30 remote sites, a main office and separate Data
Center. I have attached a show version from one of our two 7505 core
routers. As y
7 matches
Mail list logo