Frame Relay Fragmentation

2000-12-18 Thread John Neiberger
I need to turn on FRF.12 on a remote router so that I can make use of the frame-relay ip rtp priority command. However, the PVC that I'll be implementing that on connects to a router that cannot do FRF.12. Does FRF.12 need to be configured on both ends? It seems that it probably only needs to b

RE: Frame Relay Fragmentation

2000-12-19 Thread Bosio Stefano
must be supported on both side. Stefano > -Original Message- > From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: martedì 19 dicembre 2000 00.07 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Frame Relay Fragmentation > > > I need to turn on FRF.12 on a remote router s

RE: Frame Relay Fragmentation

2000-12-19 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
icembre 2000 00.07 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Frame Relay Fragmentation > > > > > > I need to turn on FRF.12 on a remote router so that I can > > make use of the > > frame-relay ip rtp priority command. However, the PVC that I'll be > > imp

RE: Bug with Frame Relay Fragmentation? [7:27215]

2001-11-26 Thread Matthew Crane
Only seen anything like this when we have had to beat up tout customers service provider and tell them how to configure Frame Relay and not mark large frames DE or simply drop when the load picks up their network. Not sure about 12.2(3) but thats just personal preference, always liek to see a T J