Ok Eric,
I just have the impression that something was wrong because my name was
just after what you wrote.
Thanks and Best Regards,
Alaerte
Eric Polin em 11/21/2002 07:31:59 PM
Para: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
cc:
Assunto:RE: GRE on Cisco routers [7:57836]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
I have 2 questions:
1)
IPSec
172.16.1.1/24 - RTA == RTB -- 172.16.2.1/24
| |
192.168.1.0/24192.168.2.0/24
Here
Is the EIGRP traffic being sent through IPsec? From the configuration I
got the impression that it is not.
H @groupstudy.com em 11/21/2002 10:42:09 AM
Favor responder a H
Enviado Por: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Assunto:GRE on Cisco routers [7:57836]
I
And RTA:-
router eigrp 1
network 10.0.0.0
the routers will create adjacencies if you add this!
they are on the same LAN.
the eigrp traffic doesn't go via the ipsec tunnel but directly...
david
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57844t=57836
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
*** So instead of getting the EIGRP routes via Tunnel 0 inteface, I'm
getting it via the outgoing interface (serial 0), the IPSec still
works. So what am I
missing, and how does it make a difference if I use GRE over IPSec? I
also tested
RIPv2
EIGRP, OSPF and RIPv2 do routing update with multicast traffic. IPSec alone
does not support multicast. GRE does support multicasting traffic. You can
use GRE over IPSec tunnel to run routing protocol such as EIGRP, OSPF or
RIPv2.
Thomas
H wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL
6 matches
Mail list logo